Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335, followed in Alzua v. Johnson, 106. Chicago, B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. McGuire, 219 U. S. 541, followed in At- Chicago, M. & St. P. R. R. Co. v. Minnesota, 134 U. S. 418, followed in In re Engelhard & Sons Co., 646. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Com. Comm., 218 U. S. 88, fol- Coyle v. Smith, 221 U. S. 559, followed in John v. Paullin, 583. De Bearn v. De Bearn, 225 U. S. 695, followed in Same v. Same, 741. Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, followed in De Bearn v. Detroit v. Parker, 181 U. S. 399, followed in Heavner v. Elkins, 743. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, followed in Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361, followed in De Bearn v. De Bearn, 741; Ex parte Harding, 219 U. S. 363, followed in Ex parte Capo, 739. Fay v. Crozer, 217 U. S. 455, followed in King v. Buskirk, 735. Fisher v. New Orleans, 218 U. S. 438, followed in Seattle & Renton Ry. v. Flint v. Stone-Tracy Co., 220 U. S. 107, followed in United States v. Foppiano v. Speed, 199 U. S. 501, followed in Rabb v. Louisiana, 740. Glickstein v. United States, 222 U. S. 139, followed in Cameron v. United Glos v. Chicago, 226 U. S. 599, followed in Glos v. O'Connell, 740. Gunn v. Barry, 15 Wall. 610, followed in Kener v. La Grange Mills, 215. Hammond v. Whittredge, 204 U. S. 538, followed in Yazoo & M. V. R. R. Heike v. United States, 217 U. S. 423, followed in Darsey v. Georgia, 741. Hurtado v. California, 110 U. S. 516, followed in Zeller v. New Jersey, Illinois Cent. R. R. Co. v. Interstate Com. Comm., 206 U. S. 454, followed Indiana v. In re Louisville, 231 U. S. 639, followed in Louisville v. Cumberland Tele- Interstate Com. Comm. v. Goodrich Transit Co., 224 U. S. 194, followed Interstate Com. Comm. v. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co., 227 U. S. 88, Joplin v. Southwest Missouri Light Co., 191 U. S. 150, followed in Glen- Kelly v. Pittsburgh, 104 U. S. 80, followed in New Louisville Jockey Club King v. Cornell, 106 U. S. 395, followed in Rainey v. W. R. Grace & Co., Knoxville Water Co. v. Knoxville, 200 U. S. 22, followed in Glenwood Kuhn v. Fairmont Coal Co., 215 U. S. 349, followed in Aetna Life Ins. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Cook Brewing Co., 223 U. S. 70, fol- lowed in Lee v. United States, 735. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Garrett, 231 U. S. 298, followed in Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Schmidt, 177 U. S. 230, followed in Louisville Trust Co. v. Knott, 191 U. S. 225, followed in Easton v. Chicago Lovell v. Newman, 227 U. S. 412, followed in Lovell v. Hentz & Company, McCune v. Essig, 199 U. S. 382, followed in Buchser v. Buchser, 157. Marshall v. Dye, 231 U. S. 250, followed in Pullman Co. y. Croom, Maxwell v. Dow, 176 U. S. 581, followed in Zeller v. New Jersey, 737. Mercantile Bank v. New York, 121 U. S. 138, followed in Amoskeag Sav- ings Bank v. Purdy, 373. Merritt v. Bowdoin College, 169 U. S. 551, followed in Kirkpatrick v. Michigan Central R. R. Co. v. Powers, 201 U. S. 245, followed in Louis- Minnesota Rate Cases, 230 U. S. 352, followed in Louisville & Nashville Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. May, 194 U. S. 267, followed in Missouri, Mobile &c. R. R. Co. v. Turnipseed, 219 U, S. 35, followed in Luria v. Mount Pleasant v. Beckwith, 100 U. S. 531, followed in New Louisville Mugler v. Kansas, 123 U. S. 623, followed in Lee v. United States, 735. New York ex rel. Metropolitan Street Ry. v. Tax Commissioners, 199 U.S. Norfolk Turnpike Co. v. Virginia, 225 U. S. 264, followed in Mulcrevy Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. Wass, 219 U. S. 426, followed in Northern North Missouri R. R. Co. v. Maguire, 20 Wall. 46, followed in Clement Pacific Telephone Co. v. Oregon, 223 U. S. 118, followed in Marshall v. Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. 168, followed in New York Life Ins. Co. v. Deer Lodge County, 495. Payne v. Niles, 26 How. 219, followed in Vicksburg v. Vicksburg Water Phoenix Railway Co. v. Landis, 231 U. S. 578, followed in Work v. Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line, 211 U. S. 210, followed in Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Garrett, 298. Press Pub. Co. v. Monroe, 164 U. S. 105, followed in Glenwood Light & Water Co. v. Glenwood Springs, 735. Preston v. Chicago, 226 U. S. 447, followed in Washington Dredging & Price v. United States, 165 U. S. 311, followed in Lee v. United States, 735. Procter & Gamble Co. v. United States, 225 U. S. 282, followed in Atchi- Reynolds v. Stockton, 140 U. S. 254, followed in Radford v. Myers, 725. Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U. S. 567, followed in Roney v. Van Ness, Schaefer v. Werling, 188 U. S. 516, followed in Heavner v. Elkins, 743. Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, followed in Glenwood Light & Water Co. v. Glenwood Springs, 735. Smith v. Indiana, 191 U. S. 138, followed in Marshall v. Dye, 250. Sohn v. Waterson, 17 Wall. 596, followed in Union Pacific R. R. Co. v. Standard Oil Co. v. Missouri, 224 U. S. 271, followed in Washington Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co. v. United States, 226 U. S. 20, followed in Starr v. Long Jim, 227 U. S. 613, followed in Monson v. Simonson, 341. nia Co., 654. Swope v. Leffingwell, 105 U. S. 3, followed in Glenwood Light & Water Treat v. Grand Canyon Ry. Co., 222 U. S. 448, followed in Straus v. Fox- Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 78, followed in Zeller v. New Jersey, Union Pacific R. R. Co. v. Laramie Stock Yards, 231 U. S. 190, followed Union Pacific R. R. Co. v. Snow, 231 U. S. 204, followed in Union Pacific Union Trust Co. v. Westhus, 228 U. S. 519, followed in Parker-Wash- United States v. Bell Telephone Co., 128 U. S. 315, followed in Luria v. United States v. Boutwell, 17 Wall. 604, followed in Pullman Co. v. United States v. Congress Construction Co., 222 U. S. 199, followed in United States v. Kagama, 118 U. S. 375, followed in United States v. United States v. Staats, 8 How. 41, followed in United States v. Davis, Washington & Georgetown R. R. Co. v. Hickey, 166 U. S. 521, followed in Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 86, followed in Marshall v. Dye, 250; King v. Buskirk, 735. Williams v. Paine, 169 U. S. 55, followed in Chavez v. Bergere, 482. Wood v. Chesborough, 228 U. S. 672, followed in De Bearn v. De Bearn, Citizenship is membership in a political society and implies the re- See INDIANS, 5, 8; CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES. 1. Limitations; effect of back pay and bounty provision of act of March 4, The proviso in the back pay and bounty provision in the Sundry Civil Appropriation Act of March 4, 1907, c. 2918, 34 Stat. 1295, 1356, |