Drug Industry Antitrust Act: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Eighty-seventh Congress, First[-second] Session, Pursuant to S. Res. 52 on S. 1552, a Bill to Amend and Supplement the Antitrust Laws, with Respect to the Manufacture and Distribution of Drugs, and for Other Purposes ...U.S. Government Printing Office, 1961 - 4217 pages |
Contents
| 1191 | |
| 1266 | |
| 1273 | |
| 1301 | |
| 1319 | |
| 1340 | |
| 1361 | |
| 1415 | |
| 1601 | |
| 1624 | |
| 1637 | |
| 1703 | |
| 1712 | |
| 1719 | |
| 1808 | |
| 1823 | |
| 1443 | |
| 1493 | |
| 1502 | |
| 1521 | |
| 1528 | |
| 1593 | |
Common terms and phrases
advertising agreement amendments American antitrust Appeals Association bill carbamate Chairman chemical chlorothiazide CHUMBRIS CIBA claims committee competition compounds compulsory licensing Congress Corp cost countries court determination dicarbamate disclosure drug application drug companies drug industry drug manufacturers drug patents effective date Estes Kefauver ethyl examiner example fact FEDERICO field filed Food and Drug grant Hydrochlorothiazide infringement interference invention inventor issued JACKSON LADD legislation MACHLUP medicine ment meprobamate MERCK milligrams monopoly party patent application patent law Patent Office patent owner patent protection patent rights patent system percent pharmaceutical physicians piperazine potassium carbonate prescribed prescription prior prior art problem product patents profits proposed propyl provisions question royalty Secretary of Health Senator HRUSKA Senator KEFAUVER settlement Sherman Act specific SQUIBB statement Subcommittee tablets testimony tests tion trade trademark TURNER U.S. Senate United USPQ utility VAGENIUS Welfare
Popular passages
Page 1534 - I enter, I will go into them for the benefit of the sick, and will abstain from every voluntary act of mischief and corruption; and, further, from the seduction of females or males, of freemen and slaves.
Page 1510 - The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention.
Page 1898 - A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains.
Page 1588 - ... not known or used by others in this country before his invention or discovery thereof, and not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country before his invention or discovery thereof...
Page 1290 - As a charter of freedom, the act has a generality and adaptability comparable to that found to be desirable in constitutional provisions.
Page 1550 - In the language of the statute, any person who "invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent," subject to the conditions and requirements of the law.
Page 1778 - This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.
Page 1883 - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The parties hereto have caused these presents to be signed in duplicate by their respective presidents and to be duly attested, and their corporate seals to be hereunto affixed, the day and year first above written.
Page 1798 - This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their successors and assigns.
Page 1605 - ... public policy and necessity, which makes it to the interest of the State that there should be an end to litigation — interest republicae ut sit finis litium.; the other the hardship on the individual that he should be vexed twice for the same cause — nemo debet vexari pro eadem causa.