...particular dangerous conditions there existing. Whether the failure of the mine examiner to mark the place was the proximate cause of the injury was a question of fact for the jury. The plaintiff had a right to rely upon the performance of the mine examiner's duty, and...

...Joy, Wright & Hudson, for appellee. SERVERS, J. 1. The material question presented in this record is whether the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury received by the plaintiff. The evidence tended to show that the rails spread, and a portion of the...

...whether the circumstances exist which create such a duty: 111 US 228; 129 Mass. 364. The question of whether the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury should have been submitted to the jury: 94 US 469; 109 SC 122; LR 3 CP 216, 222, 591 ; LR 5 HL 45 ;...

...case as above, delivered the opinion of the court. The crucial question in this case is whether or not the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury of the plaintiff, so that, in the legal acceptation of that term, it contributed to her hurt. "Causo...

...afterwards performed, and the suffering occasioned thereby, then and in that case I charge you that the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury, for which jihiintiff seeks to recover damages." The court refused to give these requested instructions,...

...Joy, Wright & Hudson,, for appellee. SEEVEES, J. — The material question presented in this record is whether the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury received by the plaintiff. The evidence tended to show that the rails spread, and a portion of the...

...Joy, Wright & Hiulson, for appellee. SEEVERS, J. 1. The material question presented in this record is whether the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury received by the plaintiff. The evidence tended to show that the rails spread, and a portion of the...

...Joy, Wright & Hudson, for appellee. SEEVERS, J. 1. The material question presented in this record is whether the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury received by the plaintiff. The evidence tended to show that the rails spread, and a portion of the...

...or by failure to exercise reasonable care and skill in any other particular, is a question of fact to be determined by the jury under proper instruction from the court, with reference to the particular facts in •each case. In these assumptions, we think we are fully...

...or by failure to exercise reasonable care and skill in any other particular, is a question of fact to be determined by the jury under proper instruction from the court, with reference to the particular facts in each case. In these assumptions we think we are fully authorized...