 | Minnesota - 1868 - 532 pages
...under the style of " be it ordained by the common council of the town of Mantorville," but no ordinance shall embrace more than one subject, which shall be expressed in its title. The common council shall meet for the transaction of business at least once in three months, and a majority... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1868 - 776 pages
...this constitutional provision are too well understood to require any eluOhio. and Pennsylvania provide that " no law shall embrace more than one subject, which shall be expressed in its title." Those of Michigan, Louisiana, and Texas are the same, substituting the word... | |
 | Michigan. Legislature. House of Representatives - 1869 - 928 pages
...known. The constitution of Minnesota, Kansas, Maryland, Kentucky, Nebraska, Ohio and Pensylvania provide that " no law shall embrace more than one subject, which shall be expressed in its title." Those of Michigan, Louisiana and Texas are the same, substituting the word... | |
 | Illinois. Constitutional Convention - 1870 - 1074 pages
...Legislative committee Ire requested to inquire into the expediency of so amending the Constitution that no law shall embrace more than one subject, which shall be named in the title; but if the title contain only one subject the law shall be valid as to that and... | |
 | 1896 - 542 pages
...only, embraces but a single subject, and is not in violation of Const, art. 3, §21, which provides that "no law shall embrace more than one subject, which shall be expressed In tbe title."— STATE v. AYERS, S. Dak., 67 NW Eep. 611. 15. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW— Obligation... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1874 - 904 pages
...The Constitutions of Minnesota, Kansas, Maryland, Kentucky, Nebraska, Ohio, and Pennsylvania provide that " no law shall embrace more than one subject, which shall be expressed in its title." Those of Michigan, New Jersey, Louisiana, and Texas are similar, substituting... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1875 - 674 pages
...support, which they could not if presented separately." The constitution of Western Virginia provides, that " no law shall embrace more than one subject, which shall be expressed in its title." The Supreme Court of that State, in Cutlip v. Sheriff, etc.. 3 West Va. 588, say : " The object of this... | |
 | 1923 - 1092 pages
...contention that the act is void for failure to comply with that provision of the Organic Act which declares, "No law shall embrace more than one subject, which shall be expressed in its title;" the basis of the contention being that the act imposes a property tax, and therefore a tax which was not... | |
 | 1884 - 1902 pages
...not the right to incorporate — to an existing company. The constitution, art. 4, § 27, provides that "no law shall embrace more than one subject, which shall be expressed in its title." Did the legislature intend more than was named in this title, and, if it did,... | |
 | 1883 - 662 pages
...portions of a Statute. In many of the American States there are constitutional provisions to the effect that no law shall embrace more than one subject which shall be expressed in its title. The effect of these provisions, and the cases decided thereunder are reviewed. American Law Governing the... | |
| |
no law shall embrace more than one subject, which shall be expressed in its title, 
