Page images
PDF
EPUB

TABLE OF CASES

REPORTED IN THIS VOLUME.

A

Abbott ads. Brown...

Alexander v. Tolleston Club of

Chicago.

65

Andrews et al. v. Andrews et al. 223

PAGE.
162

Atkins ads. Bradshaw, Admr .......
Austin v. Dufour et al..

Austine v. The People..
Ayer ads. Holdom.

can Mortgage Co...... Bryan ads. Kenley et al. Buckrice v. The People Burns v. Miller et al.

323

85

248

448

C

Carnes et al. ads. Peacock..
Challenor v. Mulligan

Chicago, City of, ads. Braun
et al.....

235 .... 652 29

Chicago & Eastern Illinois R. R.
Co. v. Geary.....

B

Chicago & Evanston R. R. Co. v.
Dresel...

96

89

Bangs et al. v. Brown et al.
Bloomington, City of, v. Shrock. 219 | Chicago & Evanston R. R. Co. v.
Board of Supervisors of McHenry

414

County ads. The People ex rel. 93 Board of Supervisors of Mercer

Co. ads. Town of New Boston. 197 Board of Supervisors of Stark

County v. The People ex rel.. 577 Board of Supervisors of Will

County v. The People ex rel.. 511
Bolden et al. v. Sherman.
418
Bradshaw, Admr. v. Atkins.. 323
Braun et al. v. City of Chicago.. 186
Brennan v. The People...

535
609

Brock ads. Lancey

Brooks et al. v. Sanders.

453

Brown v. Abbott.

162

Brown et al. ads. Bangs et al... 96
Brown et al. v. Scottish-Ameri-

PAGE. 99 666

186

Chicago, City of, ads. Harmon.. 400
Chicago & Alton R. R. Co. v.
Pennell

435

Jacobs...
Chicago & Tomah R. R. Co. ads.
Simmons, Admx.
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy
R. R. Co. v. Dougherty..
Clifford v. Drake..
Colson v. Leitch.

383

Dufour et al. ads. Austin... 242 Dunaway v. The People..

340

521 135

504

Covenant Mutual Benefit Association v. Hoffman et al........ 603 Crossett v. Owens et al..

378

D
Dawson v. Dawson

279

Dietrich ads. Sproehnle et al... 202
Dougherty ads. Chicago, Bur-

135

lington & Quincy R. R. Co... 521
Drake ads. Clifford ..
Dresel ads. Chicago & Evanston
R. R. Co..

89 85

333

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

19

M Mann et al. v. McKiernan.... McClelland ads. Towner et al.. 542 McConnell ads. Young..... 83 47 19

McDill et al. ads. McMillan et al.
McKiernan ads. Mann et al.....
McKinnon v. The People ex rel. 305
McMillan et al. v. McDill et al.. 47
Metropolis and New Columbia
Gravel Road Co. ads. Shirk
et al...

Miller et al. ads. Burns..
Miller v. Union Central Life In-
surance Co......

102

206

Moessinger, Admx. ads. Katz... 372
Moshier v. Frost et al.
Mulligan ads. Challenor..
Mullins v. The People..
Murphy ads. Grim et al..

666

42

271

661

242

[blocks in formation]

PAGE.

Newark Fire Insurance Co. v.
Sammons et al....

New Boston, Town of, v. Board
of Supervisors of Mercer Co.. 197
New v. Oldfield.....

138

O

Oldfield ads. New...

138

119

Oliver et al. v. Oliver...
Olmstead et al. ads. Thatcher... 26
Owens et al. ads. Crossett..... 378

166

R

P
Parsons et al. ads. Hill et al.... 107
Pawtucket Institution for Savings

et al. ads. Hoyt et al............. 390 Peacock v. Carnes et al... 99 Pearce et al. ads. Rhawn et al.. 350 Pennell ads. Chicago & Alton

R. R. Co... . . . . People ads. Austine.. ads. Brennan. ads. Buckrice.. ads. Dunaway.

ads. Jones..

ads. Ker....
ads. Mullins.

ads. Rider..

ads. Ritzman.
ex rel. ads. Board of Su-

pervisors of Stark Co.. 577
ex rel. ads. Board of Su-

[blocks in formation]

S

Sammons et al. ads. Newark Fire
Insurance Co...

Sanders ads. Brooks et al..
Sandoval Coal and Mining Co.

290

ads. Ewing Scates v. King..

456

Schroeder et al. ads. Richter... 112
Scottish-American Mortgage Co.

435

248

ads. Brown et al.. Sherman ads. Bolden et al. Shirk et al. v. Metropolis and New Columbia Gravel Road Co.... 661 Shrock ads. City of Bloomington. 219 Simmons, Admx. v. Chicago & Tomah R. R. Co........ 590 Simpson ads. City of Peoria et al....

535

29

340

333

627

42

Slee ads. Union Mutual Life Insurance Co..

11 362

538

Raber v. Gund..
581
Rhawn et al. v. Pearce et al.... 350
Richter v. Schroeder et al...... 112

[blocks in formation]

Smiley ads. Thebus..
Smith v. Yocum.....

Sproehnle et al. v. Dietrich.

....

538

362

528

595

U

Union Central Life Insurance Co.
ads. Miller.
Union Mutual Life Insurance Co.
v. Slee......

166 453

235 418

294

35

316 142

202

T

Thatcher v. Olmstead et al...... 26
Thebus v. Smiley...
Tiernan ads. Larned.
Tolleston Club of Chicago ads.
Alexander... ..

316
173

Towner et al. v. McClelland.. Trustees of Preemption Presbyterian Church ads. Whitsitt... 125

65 542

102

35

V

PAGE.

Van Epps ads. Johnson et al.... 551 Voltz ads. Kuecken et al...... 264

W

Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Wallace....

Wallace ads. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Ry. Co.....

Weaver v. Fisher..

114

PAGE. Wetherbee et al. ads. Fitch..... 475 Whiteside Co. ads. Johnson et al. 22 Whitsitt v. Trustees of Preëmp

tion Presbyterian Church..... 125 Wieland et al. v. Kobick.... Worden ads. Kell..

16

310

114

Y

146

Yocum ads. Smith.. Wellington v. Heermans et al... 564 Young v. McConnell..

142

83

[blocks in formation]

2. SAME-how to determine as to the weight or credibility to be given to testimony. In determining the weight or credibility to be given to any statement of fact made by a witness in the course of his testimony, it is the duty of the jury to take into consideration all the evidence, whether circumstantial or otherwise, tending to disprove such statement of fact, and which would also include contradictory statements made by other witnesses.

3. SAME-as to credibility of a defendant in a criminal prosecution, testifying in his own behalf-how to be determined. On the trial of three defendants for larceny, the court instructed the jury "that in this State the accused is permitted to testify in his own behalf; that when he does so testify he at once becomes the same as any other witness, and his credibility is to be tested by and subjected to the same tests as are legally applied to any other witness; and in determining the degree of credibility that shall be accorded to his testimony, the jury have the right to take into consideration

110 11

159 26

Filed at Ottawa May 19, 1884.

110

11

1. WITNESSES-credibility—the jury to determine. It is the peculiar province of the jury to determine whether any particular witness or witnesses are not worthy of belief, even though they are accomplices; and in passing 213 3289 upon a motion for a new trial, the court will not substitute its own opinion as to the credibility of witnesses for that of the jury.

110 11 94a $325 110 11 192 3517 110

196

11 $178

« PreviousContinue »