Reports of Cases at Law and in Chancery Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Illinois, Volume 110 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 92
Page 14
... prove such statement of fact , which , of course , would include contradictory statements made by other witnesses ; and the instruction in question does nothing more than lay down this . general principle . We see no substantial ...
... prove such statement of fact , which , of course , would include contradictory statements made by other witnesses ; and the instruction in question does nothing more than lay down this . general principle . We see no substantial ...
Page 16
... prove that the defendant was in possession of the premises , or claimed an interest or title therein . 2. INFANCY estoppel to disaffirm contract — fraudulent representations . A person is not estopped from setting up infancy as a ...
... prove that the defendant was in possession of the premises , or claimed an interest or title therein . 2. INFANCY estoppel to disaffirm contract — fraudulent representations . A person is not estopped from setting up infancy as a ...
Page 17
... prove that defendants were in possession of the premises , or claimed an interest or title therein . Rev. Stat . 1874 , chap . 45 , sec . 22 . A defendant is not estopped from setting up infancy as a defence to a contract , by his ...
... prove that defendants were in possession of the premises , or claimed an interest or title therein . Rev. Stat . 1874 , chap . 45 , sec . 22 . A defendant is not estopped from setting up infancy as a defence to a contract , by his ...
Page 18
... prove that defendants were in possession of the premises , or claimed an interest or title therein . Rev. Stat . 1874 , chap . 45 , sec . 22 . The only other question which appellants make upon the record , is as to the effect of ...
... prove that defendants were in possession of the premises , or claimed an interest or title therein . Rev. Stat . 1874 , chap . 45 , sec . 22 . The only other question which appellants make upon the record , is as to the effect of ...
Page 26
... prove its contents . But an abstract of title of real estate can not be regarded as original evidence . It is but secondary evidence itself , and therefore its contents can not be proven by other evi- dence in case of loss or ...
... prove its contents . But an abstract of title of real estate can not be regarded as original evidence . It is but secondary evidence itself , and therefore its contents can not be proven by other evi- dence in case of loss or ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
adverse possession agent alleged amount Appellate Court appellee assignment authority bank bill certificate chancery Chicago church circuit court claimed complainant contract conveyed Cook county corporation Court of Cook court of equity Daniel D debtor debts deceased declaration decree deed of trust defendant delivered the opinion duty embezzlement equity of redemption evidence execution fact Ferbrache Filed at Ottawa foreclosure Heermans held homestead instructs the jury interest issued John judgment creditor jurisdiction JUSTICE Kribs land lease levy liability lots ment Messrs mortgage notice Ottawa May 19 owner paid party payment person plaintiff in error possession premises proof purchase question Railroad Company real estate record redeem remanded reversed rule secure sold statute suit Syllabus taxes tion town tract trial trust deed Vernon Railroad Wayne county witness writ of error