Page images
PDF
EPUB

32

Fragments towards a History of Lancashire,

would require deep care and research to collect and authenticate. But this care and research would be amply rewarded by the discoveries to which it would give rise, and the interesting information which it would afford, not only to a Native partial to his County, but to the Kingdom generally; for the History of the County of Lancaster is closely connected with the history of the Country at large. I would have it commence from the earliest authorities of the Roman writers; and subsequently to the decline of the Roman power, during the reigns of the Norman, the Saxon, and lastly, the English Monarchs, and during the contentions and after the union of the Houses of York and Lancaster; its history would throw great light upon that of the kingdom during those times. To those perusing the History of Lancashire since the Union with the Sister Kingdom, I question not but that the rise and progress of this County to the pre-eminent consequence which it at present holds, would appear more rapid and astonishing than that of any part of this country since Britain was a Nation. If, then, the respective results of these several labourers in the vineyard (for a vineyard it would be) were deposited in the Libraries of Lancaster, Liverpool Royal Institution, and Manchester (Cheetham's), some Historian might then at length, from their united efforts, compile a County History worthy of its name; but until these previous preparations are made, the mind of almost every man must shrink from such an Herculean labour.

A sort of revolution, or great relative change of property, has arisen in the different parts of the County, since Trade began to be encouraged, we will say from the time of Elizabeth and her Successors (the Corporation of Liverpool in 1557, had a rental of 21. 10s.9d.; in 1721, it was 1232l. 1s. 7d.; in 1821, a rental of 72,000l. per annum). We find at that early time the various parts were rated as in the second column below; and now to the County Rate, under the new Act, as in the first column (where Liverpool now stands pre-eminently the first town in the County, and the second sea-port in the united kingdom decidedly), in 1815, when this tax was first assessed by a rental of Id. in the pound,—

* See "Fragments," p. 12.

Liverpool
Manchester
Salford
Preston
Lancaster
Wigan

[ocr errors]

County Rate,
by Act,
1815.

£. s. d.
2436 3 11
1265 11 0
199 12 6
145 11

[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

4

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

5

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

120 9
13 18 4

[ocr errors][merged small]

The whole County paid upon the Assessment of 1d. in the pound, 12,9411. 14s. 1d.; and there were several calls in the year.

The comparison of these towns at different times is curious. This statement speaks for itself, and requires no

comment.

My desire is to be looked on as a gatherer of materials, which will, I hope, be hereafter serviceable to the more finished Historian. I collect, and copy my materials as I find them. If my health is spared me (and I think my pursuits help it), I shall in no way relax my endeavours; but hope to be enabled, with that assistance which (save in one solitary instance) has never been withheld, and has usually been tendered, to publish another volume, to commence with the Fourth Part.

My attention will not be directed to extracts from printed histories, or to copies of other engravings; but to manuscripts and collections of unpublished documents, from public and private evidences, as well as original paintings and drawings. The Coucher Book of Furness Abbey is well worthy of an attentive perusal; and unbounded resources of information, hitherto unpublished, are to be found in the British Museum.

I am glad to announce that the Inquisitiones post Mortem of Lancashire, is just ready for publication, in a large volume, under the direction of those able gentlemen, Mr. Caley, Keeper of the Records at the Chapter House, Westminster, and Mr. Harper, of the Duchy of Lancaster Office, which will, in upwards of 4000 articles, throw great light upon the History of our County, as well as on the Duchy at large §. M. GREGSON, F.S.A.

These are the usual Fifteenths. See "Fragments," p. 12.

Manchester was not assessed at its value. It ought to be charged as much as Liverpool.

§ See Mr. Harper's Report of the Records in the Duchy Office.

EMBALM

THE

Embalming among the Egyptians.

1823.] EMBALMING AMong the EgypTIANS. (From the Classical Journal.) HE Egyptians, of all nations of antiquity, are most deserving of our attention. To this wise and ingenious people, who made such advances in arts and sciences, in commerce and legislation, succeeding nations have been indebted for whatever institutions civilize mankind and embellish human life. The priesthood of this very religious people, to whom knowledge was exclusively confined, being wholly free from anxiety about secular matters, as they were provided for by the State', devoted themselves to the service of the community. Their time was divided between the performance of their sacred duties and

the improvement of the mind. Study was their business; the good of the people was their sole object; and whatever could contribute to the political or moral welfare of their country, was pursued with a zeal worthy of imitation in Christian societies. It is not then surprising that they made such amazing progress in physic and husbandry, in astronomy, magic, and other occult sciences. And, though the art of embalming, as practised by them, is now obsolete, and the medicated herbs which they used may not now be ascertained, yet we may gather from the custom what study and attention they employed in discovering the virtues of simples, though the science of Medical Chemistry was probably unknown at that early period. The art of embalming the dead was peculiar to the Egyptians; they alone knew the secret of preserving the body from decay. In the Pentateuch we find that, when Abraham and Isaac died, they were simply buried; but Jacob, and afterwards Joseph, were embalmed; because these two patriarchs died in Egypt. This myste

33

rious trade descended from father to son as an hereditary and sacred privilege; the embalmers were held in high repute, conversed with the priests, and were by them admitted into the inner parts of the temples. Embalming may have been practised in Asia, but there is not any authority for this presumption: it may be inferred that the custom prevailed among the Chaldeans, on account of the proximity of their country to Egypt, and the similarity of pursuits and doctrines; an intercourse, no doubt, subsisted between these two philosophical nations from the earliest ages. After the death of Alexander the Great, the Egyptians and Chaldeans were ordered to dress the body in their own way3 (Curt. lib. x. sub fin.): but this event was many_hundred years after the times when Egypt flourished under the Pharaohs. The washing and dressing of the body alluded to by Greek and Roman writers, was merely an external application of unguents, performed with facility and despatch, not for the purpose of preserving the corpse, but in honour of the deceased. The ceremony among the Egyptians was sacred and solemn, and the process tedious, intricate, and expensive. In the patriarchal history the Sacred Writer tells us, that forty days were employed in preparing the body of Jacob for sepulture. "And Joseph commanded his servants the physicians to embalm his father, and the physicians embalmed Israel," &c. Gen. i. 2. And here it is to be observed, that the officers, called physicians, did not profess the art of curing; for physic (as it is now called) was not at that time a professional pursuit ; not a word is said of physicians being called in during Jacob's sickness. sides, the Hebrew word is rendered in the Septuagint by ivraQiaoral, those who prepared the body for burial. It

Be

Diodorus says, that a third of the lands of each province belonged to the priesthood. (Lib. i. p. 84, folio, Amster. 1745.)

2 The art of preparing drugs by fire for curative purposes is attributed to the Arabs.

Egypti Chaldæique jussi corpus suo more curare-deinde purgavere corpus; repletumque est odoribus.-I know no other passage indicative of such a custom among the Asiatics. It does not appear that Plutarch or Arrian mention this ceremony; Curtius, therefore, may have been misinformed. Cyrus in Xenophon commands his body to be committed to the earth from whence it came (μoquλo»), and in this he doubtless conformed to the custom of his country.

4 Corpusque lavant frigentis et ungunt. Virgil. Περιστέλλειν νεκρον—Και κατθανουσαν χερσιν εὐ TEPLOTEREY, Eurip. Medea, 1035. The body of Christ was anointed with myrrh and aloes, and wrapt in linen clothes. John, ch. xix, yer. 39, 40.

GENT. MAG. July, 1823.

34

Embalming among the Egyptians.

is true the author of the Pentateuch does not particularise this ceremony, but Herodotus and Diodorus are clear and diffuse in every thing relative to this interesting country5.

The Egyptians believed that the soul was immortal, or rather, that it was eternal; they imagined that it not only was not subject to death, but that it had existed from all eternity, having neither beginning nor end; they thought that as it was immaterial, it was increate, and as it was increate, that it was a part of the divine spirit, diving particula aure, and co-existent with that Being, from whom it emanated 6. In order to substantiate this doctrine, they asserted that the soul had been in a state of pre-existence, and at the dissolution of the outward man, it passed into various states; and after a circuit of three thousand years, (Herod. I. ii. c. 123) it returned to re-animate a human body. Pythagoras first transplanted this dogma from Egypt into Greece, and, though no works of that philosopher are now extant, yet we may gather from later writers the essential tenets of the Pythagorean sect'. Plato, after the death of Socrates, inculcated the same principle, in order to vali date the primary tenet of the Socratic school, the immortality of the souls. Virgil has shown himself very sedulous in propagating the same doctrine among the Romans. (Geog. iv. 220-7 ; En. vi. 750.) These two nations were of opinion, that death separated the soul from the body9; they were, therefore, no longer concerned about the perishable part of man; and being

[July,

enlightened by the rays of rational philosophy through the mists of error and superstition, they looked forward to a future state, as a reward for the virtuous, and a punishment for the damned. The Egyptians, on the contrary, were more solicitous to preserve the material part from putrefaction and injury, conceiving that the soul was inseparable from its body so long as the latter was free from corruption. Inspired by this superstition, they studied and put in practice every means of preserving the human franie: they applied to the study of natural history to discover the virtues of simples, and provided buildings of the greatest magnitude and durability as depositories for the dead, which still remain the most stupendous monuments of human labour in the world. That the pyramids were built as sepulchres for the Kings 10, there appears no reason to doubt; this is fully testified by modern travellers. Besides, Diodorus says expressly, that Chemmis and Cephron constructed them for this purpose". The principal care of the Egyptians was turned to the preserving the dead they looked upon their houses as temporary dwellings, but to their cemeteries they gave the name of the Eternal Mansions. (Diod. 1. i. p. 60.)

;

Among the three modes of embalming, that adopted by the rich was very tedious in its process, and expensive in its preparation. As soon as a man of any consideration died, the relations of the deceased, after the most violent expressions of grief, sent for the embalmer, who carried away the corpse,

5 Herod. lib. ii. c. 86, 87.-Diodor. lib. i. p. 102.

6 Humanus animus, ex divinâ mente decerptus, cum alio nullo nisi cum ipso Deo comparari possit. Cic. Tusc. 6. n. 38. "God breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living soul." Gen. ii, 7.

7 Morte carent animæ ; semperque priore relicta

Sede, novis domibus vivunt habitantque recepta.-Ovid. Sermo Pythag. Addison Spect. No. 343.

8 Παντα τοτε και νυν διαμείβεται τα ζωα εἰς ἄλληλα, νου και άνοιας ἀποβολη και κτήσει μstabaλλoμeva, Plato sub fin. Timæi.

? At cum frigida mors anima seduxerit artus. Virg.

Hom.

Θυμον ἀπὸ μελεων δύναι δομον Αίδος είσω.
Επειδαν (ή ψυχη) του σώματος διχα γενηται. Xenoph.

10 It is remarkable that Homer does not mention the pyramids, although he celebrates Thebes and its hundred gates, and frequently alludes to Egypt. This is a presumption that they were built a little before or after the age in which this poet flourished. Diodorus informs us, that these extraordinary works were built a thousand years before his time; this agrees very nearly with the age of Homer.

Pliny's words, pecuniæ otiosa ac stulta ostentatio, are more idle and foolish than the conduct which he condemns; for the motive of building these enormous works was political as well as religious.

The

1823.]

Embalming among the Egyptians.

The first part of the operation was, to extract the brains through the nostrils with a crooked instrument of iron; for the more ready performance of which the medium septum of the nose was cut away; the vacuities were then filled up with perfumes and aromatic compositions. After this, the body was opened with much ceremony. For this purpose the priest made a mark on the left side, just above the hip, to show how far the incision was to be made. A particular officer made an opening with a very sharp Ethiopian stone1?. As soon as the people saw this, they pelted him with stones, and pursued him with maledictions; for the Egyptians looked with abhorrence upon any one who offered violence to a human body either dead or alive. The embalmer then inserted his hand, and drew out all the viscera except the heart and kidneys, while the bowels were washed with odours. (Diod. p. 102.) The entrails were not restored to the abdomen, but from a religious motive they were thrown into the Nile's. (Plut. vol. ii. p. 159, folio, Paris, 1624.) Afterwards, the belly was filled with cinnamon, myrrh, and other odoriferous drugs 14; and then the orifice of the wound was closed. The body outwardly was anointed with the oil of cedars and other preservatives for 30 days. This length of time was necessary to administer the preparations for drying it and preventing its putrefaction. At the expiration of this term, the corpse was again washed, and wrapped up in many folds of linen, painted with sacred characters, and seasoned with gums and other glutinous matter. This renders the cloth so durable, that it has preserved its consistence even to the present day, as many of the specimens, lately exhibited in this country, fully

35

testify. These swathes of cere-cloth were so manifold, that there are seldom less than a thousand yards of filleting about one body; and so ingeniously were the wrappings managed, that the lineaments of the deceased were easily discernible, even though the face was covered with a kind of mask fitted with mastic. On the breast was spread a broader piece of cere-cloth, on which was inscribed some memorable sentiment; but, for the most part, having the figure of a woman with expanded arms. The embalmer having done his duty, the mummy15 was sent back to the kindred of the defunct, who deposited it in a wooden coffin, made of a species of sycamore, called in Egypt Pharaoh's fig-tree. Some few coffins have been found of solid stone; a miniature model of one in marble was to be seen at Belzoni's exhibition, from which he says the body had been taken 16. The top of the wooden coffin or mummychest was carved in the shape of a woman's head, the face being richly painted; the rest of the trunk was adorned with hieroglyphics, and the lower end was broad and flat like a pedestal, on which the coffin was placed erect in the place designed for its reception. The body of Joseph was put in a coffin. Gen. ch. 1. v. 26. The corpse was lastly conveyed down the Nile to its final destination, in a vessel called Baris". The mode just described was the most expensive, and adopted by the rich only; those, however, who were unable or unwilling to go to so great an expense, had recourse to a more simple process.

A quantity of cedar-oil and arotnatic liquors was injected, by means of a syringe, into the body at the anus; after this it was laid in nitre for seventy days, when the pipe was withdrawn,

12 Probably the same kind of stone used in circumcision. Exod. ch. iv. v. 25. 13 Mr. Belzoni assures us, that the vases or urns exhibited in London contained the bowels of mummies; but it is more probable that they are the reconditories of the ibis, or other sacred animals.

̓Αποθανοντας δε ταριχευοντες, θαπτουσι ἐν ἵρησι θηκησι. Herod.

14 The spices, which the Ishmaelitish merchants were carrying into Egypt when Joseph was sold, were no doubt designed for embalming. Gen. ch. xxxvii. v. 25.

15 Momia or Mumia, quasi Amomia, i. e. cadaver amomo conditum: Vossius. For the Amomus, brought from Syria, was a principal ingredient in the medicaments; it was mixed with spices to make that ointment with which the body was seasoned.

16 The catacombs were ransacked by the Persians on the invasion of Egypt by Cambyses, son of the great Cyrus. Herodotus states, that this infuriate prince ordered the body of Amasis, the late king, to be untombed and burnt. Lib. iii. c. 16.

17 Bapis, navigii genus, Suidas: hence is probably derived our English word bier.

[ocr errors]

and

34

Embalming among the Egyptians.

is true the author of the Pentateuch does not particularise this ceremony, but Herodotus and Diodorus are clear and diffuse in every thing relative to this interesting country.

The Egyptians believed that the soul was immortal, or rather, that it was eternal; they imagined that it not only was not subject to death, but that it had existed from all eternity, having neither beginning nor end; they thought that as it was immaterial, it was increate, and as it was increate, that it was a part of the divine spirit, diving particula aure, and co-existent with that Being, from whom it emanated 6. In order to substantiate this doctrine, they asserted that the soul had been in a state of pre-existence, and at the dissolution of the outward man, it passed into various states; and after a circuit of three thousand years, (Herod. 1. ii. c. 123) it returned to re-animate a human body. Pythagoras first transplanted this dogma from Egypt into Greece, and, though no works of that philosopher are now extant, yet we may gather from later writers the essential tenets of the Pythagorean sect". Plato, after the death of Socrates, inculcated the same principle, in order to vali date the primary tenet of the Socratic school, the immortality of the souls. Virgil has shown himself very sedulous in propagating the same doctrine among the Romans. (Geog. iv. 220-7; Æn. vi. 750.) These two nations were of opinion, that death separated the soul from the body9; they were, therefore, no longer concerned about the perishable part of man; and being

enlightened by the lay. philosophy through and superstition, they to a future state, as virtuous, and a pi damned. The Egr trary, were more the material part i injury, conceivin inseparable frora the latter was fi Inspired by this died and put in of preserving the applied to the st to discover the vi provided buildin nitude and day for the dead, w most stupendou labour in the w mids were built Kings 10, there doubt; this is travellers. Bes pressly, that

constructed t.

The principa

was turned to i

they looked u.
porary dwi
teries they
nal Mansion

Among t

ing, that a tedious in its prepar any cond

the dece

expression balmer,

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
[ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]
« PreviousContinue »