United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volume 483United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1990 |
Contents
| xlv | |
| xlvi | |
| 5 | |
| 7 | |
| 19 | |
| 35 | |
| 49 | |
| 56 | |
| 531 | |
| 538 | |
| 545 | |
| 555 | |
| 564 | |
| 574 | |
| 586 | |
| 596 | |
| 57 | |
| 73 | |
| 87 | |
| 92 | |
| 95 | |
| 104 | |
| 109 | |
| 117 | |
| 119 | |
| 125 | |
| 129 | |
| 142 | |
| 147 | |
| 150 | |
| 162 | |
| 168 | |
| 206 | |
| 211 | |
| 219 | |
| 226 | |
| 228 | |
| 245 | |
| 255 | |
| 261 | |
| 264 | |
| 267 | |
| 269 | |
| 279 | |
| 286 | |
| 302 | |
| 319 | |
| 330 | |
| 340 | |
| 350 | |
| 355 | |
| 357 | |
| 362 | |
| 365 | |
| 368 | |
| 384 | |
| 388 | |
| 390 | |
| 397 | |
| 420 | |
| 422 | |
| 423 | |
| 439 | |
| 447 | |
| 456 | |
| 469 | |
| 471 | |
| 473 | |
| 479 | |
| 481 | |
| 482 | |
| 484 | |
| 489 | |
| 494 | |
| 510 | |
| 515 | |
| 524 | |
| 528 | |
| 597 | |
| 606 | |
| 621 | |
| 635 | |
| 638 | |
| 654 | |
| 668 | |
| 678 | |
| 690 | |
| 691 | |
| 694 | |
| 698 | |
| 704 | |
| 711 | |
| 717 | |
| 735 | |
| 754 | |
| 756 | |
| 757 | |
| 761 | |
| 763 | |
| 767 | |
| 769 | |
| 780 | |
| 789 | |
| 790 | |
| 823 | |
| 832 | |
| 839 | |
| 840 | |
| 844 | |
| 854 | |
| 865 | |
| 868 | |
| 873 | |
| 875 | |
| 894 | |
| 895 | |
| 897 | |
| 898 | |
| 899 | |
| 900 | |
| 901 | |
| 902 | |
| 903 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action Adamson AFDC affirmed alleged amici curiae apply argument Attorney axle tax Bivens BLACKMUN breach BRENNAN brief cert Certiorari Certiorari denied child claim Commerce Clause concurring Congress constitutional convicted Corp counsel Court of Appeals criminal decision defendant defendant's defraud dissenting 483 U. S. District Court double jeopardy Eleventh Amendment evidence exemption fact federal Fifth Amendment filed flat taxes Fourteenth Amendment Fourth Amendment fraud Government granted hypnosis Ibid imposed interest issue Jones Act judgment jurisdiction juror jury JUSTICE JUSTICE BRENNAN Lanham Act limitations ment military murder O'CONNOR officer Opinion petitioner petitioner's plea agreement POWELL protection qualified immunity question reasonable regulation religious remanded Reported respondent respondent's risk rule SCALIA sentence sovereign immunity Stat State's statement statute statute of limitations STEVENS suit Supp supra Supreme Court testify testimony tion trial United USOC violation warrant word Olympic
Popular passages
Page 679 - When more than one claim for relief is presented . . . , the court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment.
Page 128 - §371 provides, in relevant part: "If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined not more than $10,000
Page 150 - Any person who shall be injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws may sue therefor in any district court of the United States . . . and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the cost of suit including a reasonable attorney's fee.
Page 324 - What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. . . . But what he seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally protected." Katz v. United States, supra, at 351-352
Page 389 - The inappropriate or controversial character of a statement is irrelevant to the question whether it deals with a matter of public concern. "[DJebate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wideopen, and . . . may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials.
Page 504 - Cranch 116, 136 (1812) ("The jurisdiction of the nation within its own territory is necessarily exclusive and absolute. It is susceptible of no limitation not imposed by itself"). The early admiralty cases cited today by the Court, ante, at 493, n. 25,
Page 474 - JUSTICE POWELL announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion in which THE CHIEF JUSTICE, JUSTICE WHITE, and JUSTICE O'CONNOR join. The question in this case is whether the Eleventh Amendment bars a state employee from suing the State in federal court under the Jones Act, ch. 250, 41 Stat. 1007, 46 USC §688.
Page 397 - (1978). If, but only if, an employee's speech falls within this category, a public employer seeking to abridge or punish it must show that the employee's interest is outweighed by the government's interest, "as an employer, in promoting the efficiency of the public services it performs through its employees.
Page 130 - provisions pertaining to bribery of public officials and witnesses, §201(a) defined "public official" to include "an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any department, agency or branch of Government thereof ... in any official function, under or by authority of any such department, agency, or branch of Government.
Page 848 - interference; and, second, that the means are reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the purpose, and not unduly oppressive upon individuals.' Even this rule is not applied with strict precision, for this Court has often said that 'debatable questions as to reasonableness are not for the courts but for the legislature . . . .' Eg, Sproles v. Binford, 286 US 374, 388