To bring a difference in rates within the prohibition of section 3, it must be shown that the discrimination practiced is unjust when measured by the transportation standard. In other words, the difference in rates cannot be held illegal, unless It Is... Annual Report of the Interstate Commerce Commission - Page 48by United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1924Full view - About this book
| 1928 - 1130 pages
...not attempt to equalize opportunities among localities; • • • tne difference in rates cannot be held illegal, unless it is shown that it is not...their values, or by other transportation conditions." Of course, in that case the Supreme Court was dealing with a case of undue prejudice under section... | |
| United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1953 - 942 pages
...unjust when measured by the transportation standard. In other words, the difference in rates cannot be held illegal, unless It Is shown that it is not...reasonable, and that the rate from competing points la not shown to be unreasonably low, does not establish that the discrimination la just. Both rates... | |
| United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1940 - 954 pages
...unjust when measured by the transportation standard. In other words, the difference in rates cannot be held illegal, unless it Is shown that It is not...their values, or by other transportation conditions. [Pages 523-524] The Innocent character of the discrimination practiced by the Illinois Central was... | |
| United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1941 - 958 pages
...the transportation standard. In other words, the difference in rates cannot be held illegal, nnlecB it is shown that it is not Justified by the cost of...their values, or by other transportation conditions. In Ex-River Grain from St. Louis to the South, 203 L CC 385, in determining a question of alleged discrimination... | |
| United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1948 - 1070 pages
...the transportation standard. In other words, the difference in rates cannot be held illegal, unless is shown that it is not justified by the cost of the...their values, or by other transportation conditions. In this connection the complainant says the circumstances herein are almost identical with those considered... | |
| United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1936 - 958 pages
...transportation standard. In other words, the difference in rates cannot be held illegal, unless it is shown thai it is not justified by the cost of the respective...their values, or by other transportation conditions. [Italics ours.] Upon this record we find that the proposed rates on lumber, in carloads, from the Pacific... | |
| United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1967 - 946 pages
...discrimination practiced is unjust when measured by the transportation standard— that is the rate difference is not justified by the cost of the respective services,...their values, or by other transportation conditions. See United States v. Illinois Central R. Co., 263 US 515, 524; New York v. United States, 331 US 284,... | |
| United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1958 - 1000 pages
...their action or its probable result will violate some provision of the act. Difference in rates cannot be held illegal, unless it is shown that it is not justified by cost of respective services, by their values, or by other transportation conditions. 136 COMPENSATION.... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1925 - 1420 pages
...division, the through rate is commonly increased by an arbitrary, if the traffic will bear it. «» L. ed. justified by the cost of the respective services,...their values, or by other transportation conditions. Hut the mere fact that the Knoxo rate is inherently reasonable, and that the rate from competing points... | |
| United States. U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on interstate commerce - 1926 - 94 pages
...unjust when measured by the transportation standard. In other words, the difference in rates can not be held illegal, unless it is shown that it is not...transportation conditions. But the mere fact that the rate is inherently reasonable, and that the rate from competing points is not shown to be unreasonably... | |
| |