National Labor Relations Act: Hearings Before the Special Committee to Investigate National Labor Relations Board, House of Representatives, Seventy-sixth Congress, Second[-third] Session, Pursuant to H. Res. 258 (76th Congress) a Resolution Creating a Select Committee to Investigate the National Labor Relations Board ...U.S. Government Printing Office, 1940 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 5135
... majority opinion is both intemperate and unjudicial and has already been repudiated as ' unnecessary ' and ' ill advised ' by one member of the Court . The Board regards the majority opinion as in reality a repudiation of and challenge ...
... majority opinion is both intemperate and unjudicial and has already been repudiated as ' unnecessary ' and ' ill advised ' by one member of the Court . The Board regards the majority opinion as in reality a repudiation of and challenge ...
Page 5145
... majority of the courts of its careful and impartial judgment . The standard set by the Board resulted in many delays from the time of hearing until the time of decision . Labor or- galizations and the public in the past were patient and ...
... majority of the courts of its careful and impartial judgment . The standard set by the Board resulted in many delays from the time of hearing until the time of decision . Labor or- galizations and the public in the past were patient and ...
Page 5147
... majority recommendation the review attorney would lay aside the case during this period and work on other cases until just prior to oral argument . At present the review attorney utilizes the period after the issuance of the ...
... majority recommendation the review attorney would lay aside the case during this period and work on other cases until just prior to oral argument . At present the review attorney utilizes the period after the issuance of the ...
Page 5148
... majority , this delay can be reduced to a minimum by cooperation between the review attorney and the Trial Examiner . but it seems fair to make an allowance of 1 day's delay from this cause . There also may be a loss of time to the ...
... majority , this delay can be reduced to a minimum by cooperation between the review attorney and the Trial Examiner . but it seems fair to make an allowance of 1 day's delay from this cause . There also may be a loss of time to the ...
Page 5151
... majority of the employees in an appropriate unit shall be the exclusive bargaining agency for all the employees in that unit , and provides machinery by which the question of the existence of any such majority representative may be ...
... majority of the employees in an appropriate unit shall be the exclusive bargaining agency for all the employees in that unit , and provides machinery by which the question of the existence of any such majority representative may be ...
Contents
5103 | |
5110 | |
5114 | |
5118 | |
5121 | |
5127 | |
5133 | |
5149 | |
6077 | |
6086 | |
6094 | |
6116 | |
6118 | |
6131 | |
6139 | |
6146 | |
5150 | |
5156 | |
5161 | |
5176 | |
5186 | |
5196 | |
5204 | |
5213 | |
5247 | |
5270 | |
5304 | |
5338 | |
5430 | |
5527 | |
5538 | |
5544 | |
5552 | |
5559 | |
5595 | |
5613 | |
5630 | |
5649 | |
5698 | |
5710 | |
5722 | |
5729 | |
5753 | |
5765 | |
5788 | |
5790 | |
5813 | |
5835 | |
5837 | |
5894 | |
5934 | |
5947 | |
5985 | |
5989 | |
5995 | |
6009 | |
6017 | |
6026 | |
6059 | |
6163 | |
6171 | |
6181 | |
6190 | |
6199 | |
6212 | |
6216 | |
6232 | |
6252 | |
6258 | |
6262 | |
6284 | |
6286 | |
6317 | |
6358 | |
6365 | |
6376 | |
6383 | |
6392 | |
6402 | |
6417 | |
6429 | |
6443 | |
6453 | |
6456 | |
6477 | |
6479 | |
6492 | |
6498 | |
6523 | |
6529 | |
6531 | |
6536 | |
6563 | |
6564 | |
6572 | |
6580 | |
6586 | |
6590 | |
6611 | |
6626 | |
6633 | |
6639 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
21st Region action advised agreed agreement alleged asked Assistant Association bargaining believe Benedict Wolf charge CHARLES FAHY Charles W Coal Committee COMMUNICATION NATIONAL LABOR company union complaint conference contract copy Counsel Court Cowdrill D. C. DEAR decision discharged discussed Division Edises employees evidence fact Federation feel Field Examiner filed Guild hearing Hoebreckx industry INTER-OFFICE COMMUNICATION NATIONAL Intermediate Report involved issue January July June jurisdiction La Follette Committee Labor Relations Board Leiserson letter matter memorandum Mett Nathan Witt National Labor Relations November October organization PERRICELLI personnel petition PHILIP G PHILLIPS plant possible present Progressive Mine Workers question received record refused Regional Attorney Regional Director Regional Office reinstatement representatives request review attorney Secretary Section settlement Sincerely situation staff statement strike Subject suggested tion TOLAND told TOWNE NYLANDER Trial Examiner Twelfth Region unfair labor practices United Mine Workers violation Washington week Wiener
Popular passages
Page 5183 - In any such proceeding the rules of evidence prevailing in courts of law or equity shall not be controlling.
Page 5149 - The Act establishes standards to which the Board must conform. There must be complaint, notice and hearing. The Board must receive evidence and make findings. The findings as to the facts are to be conclusive, but only if supported by evidence. The order of the Board is subject to review by the designated court, and only when sustained by the court may the order be enforced. Upon that review all questions of the jurisdiction of the Board and the regularity of its proceedings...
Page 5383 - Section 7 of the Act, the respondent, The Calco Chemical Company, Inc., has engaged in and is engaging in unfair labor practices, within the meaning of Section 8 (1) of the Act.
Page 5166 - As evidence of our intention to do all we can to hasten the resumption of work in our plants, and to promote peace, we hereby agree with you that within a period of six months from the date of resumption of work, we will not bargain with or enter into agreements with any other union or representatives of...
Page 5164 - Production standards shall be established on the basis of fairness and equity consistent with the quality of workmanship, efficiency of operations, and the reasonable working capacities of normal operators.
Page 5482 - Should differences arise between the Mine Workers and the Operators as to the meaning and application of the provisions of this Agreement, or should differences arise about matters not specifically mentioned in this Agreement, or should any local trouble of any kind arise at the mine, an earnest effort shall be made to settle such differences immediately: 1.
Page 5149 - The procedural provisions of the Act are assailed. But these provisions, as we construe them, do not offend against the constitutional requirements governing the creation and action of administrative bodies. See Interstate Commerce Commission v.
Page 5131 - As the National Labor Relations Act contemplates no more than the protection of the public rights which it creates and defines, and as the Board's order is directed solely to the employer and is ineffective to determine any private rights of the employees and leaves them free to assert such legal rights as they may have acquired under their contracts, in any appropriate tribunal, we think they are not indispensable parties for purposes of the Board's order and the statute does not require their presence...
Page 5614 - To dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any labor organization or contribute financial or other support to it; Provided, That subject to rules and regulations made and published by the Board pursuant to section 6 (a), an employer shall not be prohibited from permitting employees to confer with him during working hours without loss of time or pay.
Page 5149 - The Board must receive evidence and make findings. The findings as to the facts are to be" conclusive, but only if supported by evidence. The order of the Board is subject to review by the designated court, and only when sustained by the court may the order be enforced. Upon that review all questions of the jurisdiction of the Board and the regularity of its proceedings, all questions of constitutional right or statutory authority, are open to examination by the court.