Cases Decided in the Court of Claims of the United States, Volumes 191-201 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 49
Page 15
In fact , although the parties are both moving for some type of summary judg- ment , there seems to be a paucity of facts sufficient to meas- ure the discretion exercised by the Navy's contracting officer . For example , the plaintiff ...
In fact , although the parties are both moving for some type of summary judg- ment , there seems to be a paucity of facts sufficient to meas- ure the discretion exercised by the Navy's contracting officer . For example , the plaintiff ...
Page 135
In 1961 plaintiff's predecessor contracted on a cost - plus- fixed - fee basis with the Navy to adapt a commercial ... A Limitation of Cost provision limited the Navy's cost obligation to an estimated ceiling , and exempted plaintiff ...
In 1961 plaintiff's predecessor contracted on a cost - plus- fixed - fee basis with the Navy to adapt a commercial ... A Limitation of Cost provision limited the Navy's cost obligation to an estimated ceiling , and exempted plaintiff ...
Page 158
Findings of Fact 201 Ct . Cl . quirements were already programmed by the Navy , and that the Navy planned to put large - screen display systems on a large number of ships . Captain Cunnare's presentation showed a requirement for the ...
Findings of Fact 201 Ct . Cl . quirements were already programmed by the Navy , and that the Navy planned to put large - screen display systems on a large number of ships . Captain Cunnare's presentation showed a requirement for the ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
JUDGES AND OFFICERS OF THE COURT | 1 |
ASSISTANT ATTORNEYS GENERAL CHARGED WITH THE DEFENSE OF THE GOVERNMENT | 2 |
TABLE OF CASES REPORTED | 3 |
20 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action additional administrative agree agreement allowed amount appeal application assets authority basis Board claim clause Commission Commissioner Company completion conclusion consideration considered construction contract contractor corporation cost Count court Creek decision deduction defendant defendant's denied determined discount distribution duty effect entitled escrow filed Findings of Fact fiscal funds further Government granted held income Indian individual interest Internal Revenue Internal Revenue Code interpretation involved issue Judge judgment land limitations March Melin ment motion officer operations Opinion overtime paid panel parties patent payment percent performance period petition plaintiff position present prior production question reason received record reference renewable request reserves respect result retirement Rule scheduled shares sheet specifications suit supra surety term termination tion trial trust United whiskey