Cases Decided in the Court of Claims of the United States, Volumes 191-201 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 81
Page 32
... entitled to a deduction with respect to its guaranteed renewable policies only on the basis of 10 % of the increase in re- serves and could not properly utilize the 3 % of premiums deduc- tion for this purpose . Defendant concedes that ...
... entitled to a deduction with respect to its guaranteed renewable policies only on the basis of 10 % of the increase in re- serves and could not properly utilize the 3 % of premiums deduc- tion for this purpose . Defendant concedes that ...
Page 612
... entitled . We think this is the correct rule and should be applied here , as of January 1 , 1965 , the mandatory discharge date of plaintiff . ! The one remaining claim of the plaintiff is his contention that he is entitled to be paid a ...
... entitled . We think this is the correct rule and should be applied here , as of January 1 , 1965 , the mandatory discharge date of plaintiff . ! The one remaining claim of the plaintiff is his contention that he is entitled to be paid a ...
Page 613
... entitled to a quarters allowance and therefore during the period he was con- fined at Fort Leavenworth , he was not entitled to such an allowance . We conclude that the plaintiff is not entitled to a Bachelor's Allowance for Quarters ...
... entitled to a quarters allowance and therefore during the period he was con- fined at Fort Leavenworth , he was not entitled to such an allowance . We conclude that the plaintiff is not entitled to a Bachelor's Allowance for Quarters ...
Contents
TABLE OF STATUTES CITED AND RULES OF THE COURT CITED | 4 |
PICTURE OF SEVEN JUDGES COMPOSING COURT OF CLAIMS | 5 |
GENERAL ORDER NO 1 AMENDING RULES | 6 |
13 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administrative agreement amount Apache Tribe April April 12 Board Bordo bourbon whiskey breach BuShips clause Code collateral estoppel Company conclusion contractor corporation corporation's cost Court 201 Ct Creek decedent's decision deduction defendant defendant's denied discount distribution dividend duty earnings and profits employee entitled to recover equitable adjustment escrow estate tax Fact 201 Ct Federal filed Findings of Fact fiscal funds Ghitescu glacé fruit Government guaranteed renewable Harlington Wood income tax Indian Claims Commission interest Internal Revenue Internal Revenue Service issue January 31 land large-screen display system Melin ment motion for summary Navy Opinion of Commissioner overtime Owens-Parks paid panel parties patent percent performance period petition Pitt plaintiff prior prior art pursuant Rainier refund Regis scheduled specifications statute summary judgment supra surety Tac/Nav tank taxable taxpayer termination tion treaty trial commissioner tribe trust United whiskey