Interstate Commerce Commission Reports: Reports and Decisions of the Interstate Commerce Commission of the United States, Volume 206

Front Cover
 

Contents

Panama Canal Act Applications 427
63
Southard Feed Milling Co v Chicago N W Ry Co 636
70
A J Thompson Produce Co v Beaumont S L W Ry Co
79
Baltimore O R Co Continued Page
83
Carnation Co v Colorado S Ry Co 186 I C C 278
84
Michigan Central R Co 541
85
Handy Chocolate Co v Baltimore O R Co 146 I C C 213
86
Sugar Cases of 1933 195 I C C 127 258
96
Livestock Loading and Unloading Charges 61 I C C 223 195
101
Bananas and Coconuts from Rio Grande Crossings 456
103
Consolidated Stone Cases 200 I C C 65_
104
Fertilizers between Southern Points 113 I C C 389
113
Hart Silk Co v Erie R Co 168 I C C 357
119
Intrastate Rates on Bituminous Coal between Points
120
Redwood County Oil Co v Chicago N W Ry Co 195
149
Steam Railroads Expenditures
153
LivestockWestern District Rates 176 I C C 1
176
Mount Pleasant Fertilizer Co v Louisville N R Co
178
Tennessee Electric Power Co v Nashville C St L Ry
180
Lever Bros Co v Delaware L W R Co et al 325
186
Carolina Cotton Woolen Mills Co v Southern Ry Co
188
Investigation of Seatrain Lines Inc 195 I C C 215_ 328
189
Linters Cotton and Other Commodities to Texas Ports 5
195
Loading and Unloading Live Stock 83 I C C 248
203
ison P S Ry
205
C St L Ry Co J K Dering Coal Co v 661
217
Chicago Board of Trade v Olsen 262 U S 1 589
222
Cedarburg Fox Farms Inc v Ahnapee W Ry Co 178
224
Restriction of Proportional Rates 161 I C C 113
234
Alabama Grocery Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 197 I C
245
Long Bell Lbr Co v Abilene S Ry Co 140 I C C 219__
247
Alan Wood Steel Co v Alabama G S R Co 190 I C C 3___
257
Atlanta B C R Co American Cast Iron Pipe Co v 235
263
Smith Scott Inc v Atchison T S F Ry Co 185
267
Clark Fruit Co v Louisville N R Co 169 I C C 165
268
Atlantic Coast Line R Co Biagi Fruit Produce Co v
269
Alemite Corp v Baltimore O R Co 195 I C C 248__ 98
276
Class and Commodity Rates in the South 160 I C C 685
286
Cement in TrunkLine Territory 174 I C C 224
292
Bibb Brick Tile Co v Atlanta B C R Co 35
300
Jackson Freight Bureau v Alabama G S R Co 198 I C C
307
Amos Lbr Co v Louisville N R Co 172 I C C 253_
310
United States 282 U S 194 312 574
312
A B Cole Sons v Missouri Pac R Co 198 I C C 252__
313
Temiskaming N O Ry 151 I C C 283 656
318
McClamrock Co v Atlantic Y Ry Co 178 I C C 445__
320
Great Northern Ry Co 548
325
Investigation of Seatrain Lines Inc 195 I C C 215
328
Flour City S S Co v Lehigh Valley R Co 24 I C C 179__
340
Petroleum and Its Products 171 I C C 286 176 I C C 637
352
RudyPatrick Seed Co v Abilene S Ry Co 160 I C C 725
355
Fort Benning R Co Acquisition 193 I C C 223 193
363
Phillips Co v Grand Trunk W Ry Co 236 U S 662 214 560
365
Hiddenite Granite Co v Yadkin R Co 192 I C C 389 48
366
New York Dock Ry v Baltimore O R Co 73 I C C 656
367
Revenues Pooling of Union Belt of Detroit
371
Western Rate Advance Case 35 I C C 497
382
Fruits and Vegetables 43 I C C 291
385
Boydton Mfg Co Inc v Southern Ry Co 188 I C C 64
393
Garrett Lbr Co v Chesapeake O Ry Co 55 I C C 637
397
Board of Trade Cotton Exc of Galveston v Alabama V
401
Coal fromDanville Group to Joliet etc Ill
408
Holmes Hallowell Co v Great Northern Ry Co 69 I C C
409
St Louis S P R v Pekin P U Ry Co 26 I C C 226
419
Milk and Cream Rates to Philadelphia Pa 45 I C C 371
464
Bailey Grocery Co Inc v Chicago B Q R Co 559
473
Idaho Grimm Alfalfa Seed Growers Assn v Aberdeen R
477
Home Fertilizer Co v Louisville N R Co 190 I C C 571 47
483
Steam Railroads Expenditures by Class I 153
485
Louisville N R Co v Central Iron Co 265 U S 59
494
Boston A R New York Central R Co Lessee Lever
495
Portland Co v New York N H H R Co 147 I C C 615_
496
Lumber at Mobile Ala Wharfage Charges
499
Buffalo R P Ry Co American Linseed Co et al v 325
507
San Antonio Ry Co v Morgan 257 S W 701 560
508
Lake Superior Docks to Wisconsin
518
Arab Gasoline Co v Aberdeen R R Co 194 I C C
528
Coconuts and Bananas from Rio Grande Crossings 456
531
General Rate Level Investigation 1933 195 I C C 5
539
Cole Sons v Missouri Pac R Co 313
545
Montrose Delta Counties Freight Rate Assn v Denver
547
Glas Bloom Co v Asherton G Ry Co 611
548
Arizona Grocery Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 284 U
561
American Hawaiian S S Co v Erie R Co 152 I C C 703 341
564
Tilghman Lumber Corp v Atlantic Coast Line R Co 181
572
Georgia Pub Serv Comm v Atlantic Coast Line R Co 186
573
Illinois Central R Co v Henderson Elevator Co 226 U S 441 268
574
Globe Superior Corp v Boston M R 186 I C C 404 376
583
Sayles Finishing Plants v Aberdeen R R Co 172 I C C 237
584
TurnerAltus Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 139 I C C 4 644
588
Central R Co of New Jersey v United States 257 U S 247
591
Arizona Packing Co v Arizona E R Co 81 I C C 115_ 229
592
OutofRoute and BackHaul Charges 169 I C C 105
596
Magnolia Petroleum Co v Chicago R I G Ry Co 151
607
Chicago B Q R Co A Z Bailey Grocery Co Inc v 559
613
Paraffine Companies Inc v Southern Pac Co 128 I C C 421
614
F A Class Scale Case 45 I C C 254
617
Marcus Co v Baltimore O R Co 200 I C C 455 27
618
Coal fromAla Ky Tenn and Va 167 I C C 3 213
627
Missouri Pac R Co
633
Southwestern Brick Cases 173 I C C 570
634
Southwestern Vegetable Case 200 I C C 355 298 378 386 532
644
Bush Terminal R Co National Can Co v
657
Mail Compensation Air
675
Alabama G S R Co 197 I C C 591 224
715
Delta Valley S Ry Co Acquisition 202 I C C 137
790
Golden Co v Adams Express Co 46 I C C 541 464
791
Columbia Oil Co v Alabama G S R Co
793
Cole Sons v Missouri Pac R Co 198 I C C 252 206
794
Chicago R I P Ry Co Arkansas Cotton Seed Crushers
800
Table of commodities
801
Table of localities
807
Scrap or Waste Paper 176 I C C 293 179 I C C 71 45 132
808
Index digest
823
Morristown Chamber of Commerce v Southern Ry Co 172
825
Wailes DoveHermiston Corp v Aberdeen R R Co 192
828
CaliforniaArizona Ginners Crushers Assn v Apache
832
Gulf S I R Co Mississippi Farm Bureau Cotton Assn v 401
839
Denunzio Fruit Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 179 I C
842
Rome Oil Mills v Central of Georgia Ry Co 325
847
Compensation Air Mail 675
852
Steel Sheet and Barrel Heads to New Orleans La 281
856
Heads Barrel and Sheet Steel to New Orleans La 281
858
Malleable Iron Range Co v Chicago M St P P R Co 56
859
Dering Coal Co v Cleveland C C St L Ry Co 96
863
Cotton Seed Crushers Assn ofAlabama v Louisville
870
Hill Packing Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co_ 325
873
Crandall Horse Co v Baltimore O R Co 209
882

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 345 - Act to regulate commerce to own, lease, operate, control, or have any interest whatsoever (by stock ownership or otherwise, either directly, indirectly, through any holding company, or by stockholders or directors In common, or in any other manner) in any common carrier by water operated through the Panama Canal or elsewhere with which said railroad or other carrier aforesaid does or may compete for traffic...
Page 448 - That it shall be unlawful for any common carrier subject to the provisions of this act to make or give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any particular person, company, firm, corporation, or locality, or any particular description of traffic, in any respect whatsoever...
Page 345 - In every case of such extension the rates, schedules, and practices of such water carrier shall be filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission and shall be subject to the act to regulate commerce and all amendments thereto in the same manner and to the same extent as is the railroad or other common carrier controlling such water carrier or interested in any manner in its operation...
Page 345 - If the Interstate Commerce Commission shall be of the opinion that any such existing specified service by water other than through the Panama Canal is being operated in the interest of the public and is of advantage to the convenience and commerce of the people...
Page 321 - ... it shall be the duty of the commission to investigate the matters complained of in such manner and by such means as it shall deem proper.
Page 312 - (4) Whenever in any such investigation the Commission, after full hearing finds that any such rate, fare, charge, classification, regulation, or practice causes any undue or unreasonable advantage, preference, or prejudice as between persons or localities in intrastate commerce on the one hand and interstate or foreign commerce...
Page 574 - ... shall prescribe the rate, fare, or charge, or the maximum or minimum, or maximum and minimum, thereafter to be charged...
Page 321 - That the Commission may conduct its proceedings in such manner as will best conduce to the proper dispatch of business and to the ends of justice.
Page 332 - From and after the first day of July, nineteen hundred and fourteen, it shall be unlawful for any railroad company or other common carrier subject to the Act to regulate commerce to own, lease, operate, control, or have any interest whatsoever (by stock ownership or otherwise, either directly, indirectly, through any holding company, or by stockholders or directors in comii, or in any other manner...
Page 322 - But the more liberal the practice in admitting testimony, the more imperative the obligation to preserve the essential rules of evidence by which rights are asserted or defended. In such cases the...

Bibliographic information