Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Ohio, Volume 74Robert Clark, 1906 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
55 Ohio St action Admr alleged Argument for Defendant Argument for Plaintiff assignment auditor bank bonds Causes not reported charge Chicago & St Cincinnati Circuit Court cited and commented claim clerk common pleas concur contract corporation court of common Court of Hamilton CREW and SPEAR Cuyahoga county Darke county Decided April Decided February Decided March defendant in error dwelling-house election Elyria Ency ERROR to Circuit evidence ex rel facts February 20 filed following authorities Gaiser Hamilton county indictment Insurance Judgment affirmed jury Lambright land lien Lucas county ment Messrs municipal Ohio Central Railway Ohio St Opinion party person petition plaintiff in error PRICE prosecution question Railroad Company Railway Company reported in full reversed Revised Statutes rule SHAUCK Smith SPEAR and DAVIS Stat Statement street SUMMERS and DAVIS sureties tion township treasurer trial vacate village
Popular passages
Page 384 - There must be reasonable evidence of negligence; but where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care.
Page 189 - It shall be the duty of the Legislature to provide for the organization of cities and incorporated villages, and to restrict their power of taxation, assessment, borrowing money, contracting debts, and loaning their credit, so as to prevent abuses in assessments and in contracting debt by such municipal corporations...
Page 121 - More than this, it is an insulting attempt to put the laborer under a legislative tutelage, which is not only degrading to his manhood, but subversive of his rights as a citizen of the United States. He may sell his labor for what he thinks best, whether money or goods, just as his employer may sell his iron or coal; and any and every law that proposes to prevent him from so doing is an infringement of his constitutional privileges, and consequently vicious and void.
Page 178 - Civil actions can only be commenced within the periods prescribed in this title, after the cause of action shall have accrued, except where, in special cases, a different limitation is prescribed by statute, and in the cases mentioned in section seventy-three.
Page 131 - ... and when the fact of such defect shall be made to appear in the trial of any action in the courts of this state, brought by such...
Page 292 - where a principal has, by his voluntary act, placed an agent in such a situation that a person of ordinary prudence, conversant with business usages and the nature of the particular business, is justified in presuming that such agent has authority to perform...
Page 384 - When a thing which causes the injury is shown to be under the management of the defendant, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen, if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care.
Page 14 - States shall have power in the trial of actions at law, on motion and due notice thereof being given, to require the parties to produce books or writings in their possession or power, which contain evidence pertinent to the issue...
Page 59 - An act to provide against the evils resulting from the sale of intoxicating liquors in the State of Ohio,
Page 226 - Street car at the corner of Pearl and Detroit streets, as he had intended, and he claims that he did not know of the mistake in the transfer until the conductor on the St. Clair Street car refused to accept the transfer, and demanded payment of the fare, which the defendant in error refused to make. He was forcibly ejected from the car, and brought this action to recover damages for the refusal to carry him, and for ejecting him. Upon the trial of the case in the Court of Common Pleas, the jury was...