INVESTIGATION OF 1907.

1764 Salvatore Falcone, Palermo.. Marden, Orth & Hastings,

DETECTION OF ADULTERATION.

NOTES ON THE MICROSCOPICAL EXAMINATION OF SICILIAN SUMAC AND ITS ADULTERANTS.

By B. J. HOWARD, Chief, Microchemical Laboratory.

The differentiation of pure and adulterated sumac by means of the microscope is not at all a new procedure, but it does not appear to be generally employed by the trade in this country. The work done in this laboratory indicates that this is a convenient and quick method of identifying certain of the common adulterants in Italian sumac leaves, and that in the detection of the most common adulterant, Pistacia lentiscus, no great experience is necessary to obtain reliable results. The examinations here reported include only commercial samples, most of which were in a powdered form, and hence no studies of sections were made. The investigations have been in progress since 1903. The paper by Priestman" will be found very useful to beginners along this line, but the technique of the method as there described seems to leave something to be desired in the way of simplification. As will be shown, the technique adopted in this laboratory is quite different, and, it is believed, has some advantages over Priestman's. '

APPARATUS AND REAGENTS.

The most important apparatus required is a good compound microscope giving a range of magnification of from about 75 to 200 diameters. Magnifications of 90 and 180 were actually used in the work here reported, but if approximately these powers are used, giving good definition, no trouble should be experienced. The instrument should have fine and coarse adjustments and a substage condenser with iris diaphragm. A mechanical stage with wide range of movement (about 2.5 cm or more) will be found very convenient, though it is not really necessary.

Microscope slides 25 by 75 mm (1 by 3 inches) and cover-glasses, round or square, are required, round covers of 0.75 inch diameter and from 0.17 to 0.25 mm in thickness, listed by some dealers in microscopical apparatus as No 2, are preferred. Some device for producing a small flame, such as a micro-bunsen burner or small alcohol

117

a J. Soc. Chem. Ind., 1905, 24: 231.

(26)

lamp, is required. In addition to the above, a pair of teasing-needles, a pair of small forceps, and a scalpel should be secured.

As a clearing agent a chloral hydrate solution made up as follows was almost exclusively used: Chloral hydrate, 150 grams; water, 100 cc.

Among other reagents of occasional value the following should be noted: Alcohol of two strengths, 70 per cent and 95 per cent; two grades of glycerin, 100 per cent and 50 per cent (glycerin and water 1:1 by volume), and glycerin jelly are needed if permanent specimens are to be made, and this will almost always be done by careful workers.

The glycerin jelly is made up as follows: Best gelatin, 1.5 parts; water, 3 parts, and glycerin, 4 parts. Some persons" prefer to use only 1 part of gelatin, since it gives a jelly more easily worked than the amount mentioned. Soak the gelatin in the water until it is soft, add the glycerin, and heat over a water bath, finally adding two or three drops of carbolic acid as a preservative.

TECHNIQUE.

The difficulty encountered on examining specimens mounted in water or glycerin direct is due to the fact that they are too opaque and contain considerable air. Some means of clearing the fragments are necessary. Priestman' treated the sample with nitric acid, which attacked the more delicate tissues of the leaf first, and if the action was stopped at the right time, the leaf epidermis could be mounted as nearly clean tissues. This method is laborious if a large number of samples is to be tested, and seems to require considerable judgment as to just the stage at which the action is to be stopped, and hence is not desirable unless one is very familiar with microscopical technique.

In this work the chloral hydrate solution before mentioned was used. A small amount of the specimen is placed upon a slide with two or three drops of the solution and gently heated to boiling over the micro-bunsen burner or alcohol flame and kept gently boiling for about one minute. If the chloral hydrate solution boils away before the heating is finished, a few drops more are added, for if the specimens become dry the object of the treatment is defeated. After the boiling is completed the specimen is allowed to cool down somewhat, a cover-glass is placed over it and the specimen is ready for examination. If too much of the original specimen has been used, the mass will be too dense to give satisfactory results. A few tests, however, will demonstrate to the worker the most satisfactory amount

a Clark's Practical Methods in Microscopy, 2d edition, 1896, p. 243.

b Loc. cit.