 | United States. National Labor Relations Board - 1952 - 1052 pages
...continued: Nor does it mean that even as to matters not requiring expertise a court may displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even...different choice had the matter been before it de novo. Congress has merely made it clear that a reviewing court is not barred from setting aside a Board decision... | |
 | United States. Department of Agriculture - 2003 - 544 pages
...substantial evidence. "The substantial-evidence standard does not allow a court to displace the [Agencies'] choice between two fairly conflicting views, even...different choice had the matter been before it de novo." Trimmer v. United States Dep't of 'Labor, 174F.3d 1098, 1102 (10th Cir. 1999) (quotation marks and... | |
 | United States. National Labor Relations Board - 1972 - 924 pages
...NLRB, 105 USApp.DC 37, 39, 263 F.2d 483. 485 (1959). A reviewing court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even...Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 US 474,488,71 S.Ct. 456, 465, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). Given these standards, we find that the Board's conclusion that McLoughlin... | |
 | United States. National Labor Relations Board - 1975 - 1240 pages
...court has repeatedly recalled the Supreme Court's caveat that the courts may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even...before it de novo." Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 1951, 340 US 474, 488, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456. See, eg NLRB v. Davis Cafeteria, Inc., 5 Cir. 1968,... | |
 | United States. National Labor Relations Board - 1954 - 1568 pages
..."Nor does it mean that even as to matters not requiring expertise a court may displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even...been before it de novo." Universal Camera Corp. v. NLR JB., 340 US 474, 488, 71 S. Ct. 456, 465, 95 L. Ed. 456. The Board's view does not fairly conflict... | |
 | United States. National Labor Relations Board - 1968 - 1564 pages
...furnishes, including the body of evidence opposed to the Board's view,' it may not 'displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even...different choice had the matter been before it de ncco? " Looking first to the respondent's contention that there is absolutely no evidence of anti-union... | |
 | United States. National Labor Relations Board - 1968 - 1432 pages
...Nor does it mean that even as to matters not requiring expertise a court may displace the 290 Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even...justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been berfore it de novo. * * * See, also, NLRB v. Marcus Trucking Co., Inc.. 2 Cir., 286 F.2d 583, 592.... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce - 1951 - 242 pages
...respect. Nor does it mean that even as to matters not requiring expertise a court may displace the board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even...different choice had the matter been before it de novo. Congress has merely made it clear that a reviewing court is not barred from setting aside a board decision... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Interstate and foreign commerce - 1951 - 246 pages
...respect. Nor does it mean that even as to matters not requiring expertise a court may displace the board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even...different choice had the matter been before it de novo. Congress has merely made it clear that a reviewing court is not barred from setting aside a board decision... | |
| |
Nor does it mean that even as to matters not requiring expertise a court may displace the board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo. 
