Atomic Energy Commission reports v.8, Volume 8 |
Contents
| 101 | |
| 104 | |
| 108 | |
| 114 | |
| 126 | |
| 131 | |
| 161 | |
| 176 | |
| 193 | |
| 200 | |
| 201 | |
| 229 | |
| 242 | |
| 247 | |
| 280 | |
| 334 | |
| 339 | |
| 373 | |
| 379 | |
| 435 | |
| 439 | |
| 701 | |
| 715 | |
| 718 | |
| 771 | |
| 850 | |
| 857 | |
| 923 | |
| 928 | |
| 931 | |
| 1117 | |
| 1144 | |
| 1175 | |
| 1184 | |
| 1241 | |
| 1243 | |
| 1245 | |
| 1279 | |
| 1298 | |
| 1306 | |
| 1310 | |
Common terms and phrases
additional amended AMERICA ATOMIC ENERGY Appendix Applicant Ex Applicant's Exhibit ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION Bailly basis Board concludes Board finds certification CFR Part 50 Commission's considered construction permit Consumers Power Company contentions cooling towers criteria dated discharge Dixy Lee Ray Docket ECCS effluent Electric environmental effects environmental impact evaluation evidence evidentiary hearing filed Final Environmental Statement following Tr fuel FWPCA inerting initial decision intervene intervenors issuance issues Joint-Intervenors Lake Anna Lake Granbury Lakeshore Licensing Board limited matter Memorandum and Order metal-water reaction motion NEPA North Anna Nuclear Power October operating license parties Peach Bottom petition PG&E plant Power Company Power Station prehearing conference proposed facility pursuant quality assurance radioactive reactor reasonable record Regulatory Staff request result rule SAFETY AND LICENSING schedule Section slurry wall specific Squaw Creek Reservoir Staff Ex Staff's Exhibit supra temperature testimony thermal Vermont Yankee water quality witness
Popular passages
Page 167 - Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, a detailed statement by the responsible official on (i) the environmental impact of the proposed action, (ii) any adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided should the proposal be implemented, (iii) alternatives to the proposed action, (iv) the relationship between local short-term uses of man's environment and the maintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity, and (v) any irreversible and irretrievable...
Page 347 - Commission that the final design provides reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered.
Page 166 - ... include in every recommendation or report on proposals for legislation and other major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment...
Page 342 - ... on the basis of the foregoing, there is reasonable assurance that (i) such safety questions will be satisfactorily resolved at or before the latest date stated in the application for completion of construction of the proposed facility and...
Page 918 - Government to use all practicable means, consistent with other essential considerations of national policy, to improve and coordinate Federal plans, functions, programs, and resources...
Page 638 - To declare a national policy which will encourage productive and enjoyable harmony between man and his environment; to promote efforts which will prevent or eliminate damage to the environment and biosphere...
Page 233 - Rule 35, the court in which the action is pending may make such orders in regard to the failure as are just...
Page 638 - The Congress authorizes and directs that, to the fullest extent possible: (1) the policies, regulations, and public laws of the United States shall be interpreted and administered in accordance with the policies set forth in this Act...
Page 19 - In fact, there may be significant environmental damage (eg, water pollution), but not quite enough to violate applicable (eg, water quality) standards. Certifying agencies do not attempt to weigh that damage against the opposing benefits. Thus the balancing analysis remains to be done. It may be that the environmental costs, though passing prescribed standards, are nonetheless great enough to outweigh the particular economic and technical benefits involved in the planned action. The only agency in...
Page 21 - ... as low as is reasonably achievable. The term "as low as is reasonably achievable" means as low as is reasonably achievable taking into account the state of technology, and the economics of improvements in relation to benefits to the public health and safety, and other societal and socioeconomic considerations and in relation to the utilization of atomic energy in the public interest.