Fascism: Fascism and culture

Front Cover
Roger Griffin, Matthew Feldman
Taylor & Francis, 2004 - 2104 pages
The nature of 'fascism' has been hotly contested by scholars since the term was first coined by Mussolini in 1919. However, for the first time since Italian fascism appeared there is now a significant degree of consensus amongst scholars about how to approach the generic term, namely as a revolutionary form of ultra-nationalism. Seen from this perspective, all forms of fascism have three common features: anticonservatism, a myth of ethnic or national renewal and a conception of a nation in crisis. This collection includes articles that show this new consensus, which is inevitably contested, as well as making available material which relates to aspects of fascism independently of any sort of consensus and also covering fascism of the inter and post-war periods.This is a comprehensive selection of texts, reflecting both the extreme multi-faceted nature of fascism as a phenomenon and the extraordinary divergence of interpretations of fascism.
 

Contents

IV
13
V
21
VI
39
VII
71
VIII
99
IX
120
X
169
XII
171
XVIII
225
XIX
249
XX
251
XXI
264
XXII
292
XXIII
307
XXIV
331
XXV
333

XIII
173
XIV
183
XV
204
XVII
218
XXVI
353
XXVII
355
XXX
372
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 11 - Egscist revolutions of the twentieth century do not merit tnetrHeTof revolution. They lacked the ambition of universality. Mussolini and Hitler, of course, tried to build an empire, and the National Socialist ideologists were bent, explicitly, on world domination. But the difference between them and the classic revolutionary movement is that, of the nihilist inheritance, they chose to deify the irrational, and the irrational alone, instead of deifying reason. In this way they renounced their claim...

Bibliographic information