What is required by Congress is the removal of artificial, arbitrary, and unnecessary barriers to employment when the barriers operate invidiously to discriminate on the basis of racial or other impermissible classification. Monthly Labor Review - Page 711972Full view - About this book
| 1974 - 226 pages
...has been interpreted by the courts as evidence of discriminatory practice. Griggs states that "What is required by Congress is the removal of artificial,...arbitrary, and unnecessary barriers to employment when the Where barriers to equal employment exist, positive and affirmative action is required to reverse an... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1972 - 218 pages
...preference for any group, minority or majority, is preciselv and only what Congress has proscribed. What is required by Congress is the removal of artificial,...of racial or other impermissible classification." See also eg. Gregory v. Litton Systems Inc.. 316 F. Snpp. 401 (CD Calif., 1970), where the court held... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee No. 4 - 1972 - 222 pages
...preference for any sroup. minority or nia.lority. Is preciselr and ^nlv what Congress has proscribed. What Is required by Congress Is the removal of artificial,...discriminate on the basis of racial or other impermissible olnssificntion " Kee aluo eg, Grenoru v. Litton Ktistcms Inc., 316 F. Rupp. 401 (CD Calif., 1970),... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1972 - 1232 pages
...maintained if they operate to "freeze" the status quo of prior discriminatory employment practices. What is required by Congress is the removal of artificial,...invidiously to discriminate on the basis of racial or other impermissable classification. The act proscribes not only overt discrimination but also practices that... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee No. 4 - 1972 - 554 pages
...maintained if they operate to freeze the status quo of prior discriminatory employment practices. What is required by Congress is the removal of artificial,...invidiously to discriminate on the basis of racial or impermissible classification. Mr. McCLORY. Mr. Chairman, may I ask one more question? Do the applications... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Select Committee on Equal Educational Opportunity - 1971 - 1584 pages
...private employers in Section 703. 16. The Supreme Court held that in Section 703 Congress required "the removal of artificial, arbitrary, and unnecessary...of racial or other impermissible classification." Griggs v. Duke Power Company. 39 US LW 4317, 4319 (March 8, 1971). The Act proscribes not only "over... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1973 - 208 pages
...maintained if they operate to "freeze" the status quo of prior discriminatory employment practices. What is required by Congress is the removal of artificial,...invidiously to discriminate on the basis of racial or other impermissable classification. The act proscribes not only overt discrimination but also practices that... | |
| United States Congress. House. Banking and Currency Committee - 1974 - 1396 pages
...Art of 1!W>4. The Court defined discrimination as any "artificial, arbitrary, and unnecessary barrier to employment when the barriers operate invidiously...racial or other impermissible classification." The definition adopted in this bill is designed to take advantage of judicially interpreted civil rights... | |
| |