What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
accord agent appear applied arise authority Bank brought Brown cause of action Chapin Cas charge Chicago circumstances City Clark committed common condition Conn considered constitute contract course courts damages dangerous Davis defendant defendant's determine difference doctrine duty effect established evidence exercise existence fact false force give given hand held Hence illustrations individual infra injury instance Iowa jury land latter liable malicious Mass master means merely Minn motive N. J. Law N. Y. Supp nature negligence nuisance officer Ohio owner party performance permitted person plaintiff possession prevent principle proper protection question reason received recover recovery refused regarded responsible result rule servant Smith South statute supra third tion Torts trespass true Union violation wrong York
Page 110 - To justify the State in thus interposing its authority in behalf of the public, it must appear, first, that the interests of the public generally, as distinguished from those of a particular class, require such interference; and, second, that the means are reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the purpose, and not unduly oppressive upon individuals.
Page 512 - We think that the true rule of law is that the person who, for his own purposes, brings on his land and collects and keeps there anything likely to do mischief if it escapes, must keep it in at his peril ; and if he does not do so, is prima facie answerable for all the damage which is the natural consequence of its escape.
Page 436 - ... attending at any place where any such person or persons may lawfully be, for the purpose of peacefully obtaining or communicating information, or from peacefully persuading any person to work or to abstain from working; or from ceasing to patronize or to employ any party to such dispute, or from recommending, advising, or persuading others by peaceful and lawful means so to do...
Page 448 - But if the persuasion be used for the indirect purpose of injuring the plaintiff, or of benefiting the defendant at the expense of the plaintiff, it is a malicious act which is in law and in fact a wrong act, and therefore a wrongful act, and therefore an actionable act if injury ensues from it.
Page 371 - In form, it is a fiction; in substance, a remedy to recover the value of personal chattels wrongfully converted by another to his own use.
Page 436 - That no restraining order or injunction shall be granted by any court of the United States, or a judge or the judges thereof, in any case between an employer and employees, or between employers and employees, or between employees or between persons employed and persons seeking employment, involving, or growing out of, a dispute concerning terms or conditions of employment...
Page 225 - Where, by any wrongful act or omission of any partner acting in the ordinary course of the business of the partnership, or with the authority of his copartners, loss or injury is caused to any person, not being a partner in the partnership, or any penalty is incurred, the partnership is liable therefor to the same extent as the partner so acting or omitting to act.
Page 512 - ... who has brought something on his own property (which was not naturally there), harmless to others so long as it is confined to his own property, but...
Page 250 - As a general rule, in order to found a suit in England, for a wrong alleged to have been committed abroad, two conditions must be fulfilled. First, the wrong must be of such a character that it would have been actionable if committed in England. . . . Secondly, the act must not have been justifiable by the law of the place where it was done.