Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Books Books
" ... and if it has intimated its will, however indirectly, that will should be recognized and obeyed. The major premise of the conclusion expressed in a statute, the change of policy that induces the enactment, may not be set out in terms, but it is not... "
Cases Decided in the United States Court of Claims ... with Report of ... - Page 58
by United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - 1953
Full view - About this book

Emergency Relief Appropriation Act, Fiscal Year 1941, Hearings Before ... 76 ...

United States. Congress. Senate. Appropriations Committee - 1940 - 296 pages
...enactment may not be set out in terms, but it is not an adequate discharge of duty for courts to say : 'We see what you are driving at but you have not said it, and therefore we shall go on as before.' " See also United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co. (259 US 344, 385-389; 1922) ; Funk v. United States...
Full view - About this book

Use of Mechanical Reproduction of Music: Hearings Before a Subcommittee ...

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Interstate Commerce - 1942 - 118 pages
...enactment, may not be set out in terms, but it is not an adequate discharge of duty for the courts to say : We see what you are driving at, but you have not said it, and therefore we shall go on as before." Johnson v. United States, 163 Fed. 30, 32. The relation of the Norris-LaGuardia Act to the Clayton...
Full view - About this book

Bulletin of the Judge Advocate General of the Army, Volume 1

1943 - 580 pages
...enactment, may not be set out in terms, but it is not an adequate discharge of duty for courts to say: We see what you are driving at, but you have not said it, and therefore we shall go on as before." Johnson v. United States, 168 Fed. 30, 32 ; and in Van Beeck v. Sattne Towiny Co., 300 US 342, 350,...
Full view - About this book

United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ..., Volume 335

United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1949 - 1012 pages
...exclude leased areas, such as the Bermuda base, in the word "possession" appears. We cannot even say, "We see what you are driving at, but you have not said it, and therefore we shall go on as before." " Under such circumstances, our duty as a Court is to construe the word "possession" as our judgment...
Full view - About this book

Hearings Before the Committee on Agriculture, House of ..., Volume 2

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Agriculture - 1949 - 1434 pages
...enactment, may not be set out in terms, but it is not an a'lpquate discharge of duty for courts to say : We see what you are driving at, but you have not said it, and therefore we shall go on as before' Johnson v. United States ( (CCA 1st) 163 F. 30, 32, 18 LBA (NS) 1104, 2 Am. Bank. Bep. 724)." In the...
Full view - About this book

Cotton Acreage Allotment and Marketing Quota Programs (including Peanuts and ...

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Agriculture - 1949 - 262 pages
...enactment, may not be set out in terms, but it is not an adequate discharge of duty for courts to say : We see what you are driving at, but you have not said it, and therefore we shall go on as before' Johnson, v. United States ( (CCA 1st) 163 F. 30, 32, 18 LRA (NS) 1194, 2 Am. Bank. Rep. 724)." In the...
Full view - About this book

Hearings Before the Committee on Agriculture, House of Representatives ...

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Agriculture - 1949 - 518 pages
...enactment, may not be set out in terms, but it is not an adequate discharge of duty for courts to say : 'We see what you are driving at, but you have not said it, and therefore we shall go on as before.' Johnson v. United States ((COA 1st) 163 F. 30, 32, 18 LEA (NS) 1194, 2 Am. Bank. Rep. 724)." While...
Full view - About this book

Hearings Before the Committee on Agriculture, House of Representatives ...

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Agriculture - 1949 - 1378 pages
...enactment, may not be set out in terms, but it is not an adequate discharge of duty for courts to say: We see what you are driving at, but you have not said it, and therefore we shall go on as More.' Johnson v. United States ( (CCA 1st) 163 F. 30, 32, 18 LRA (NS) 1194, 2 Am. Bank. Rep. 7:>4)."...
Full view - About this book

Status of Forces Agreements: Hearings Before...

United States. Congress. House. Foreign Affairs Committee - 1955 - 1098 pages
...answered such an argument when he said "it is not an adequate discharge of duty for courts to say : We see what you are driving at, but you have not said it, and therefore we shall go on as before." Johnson v. United States, 163 Fed. 30, 32 (CA 1). Here, Congress has plainly "said it" and there is...
Full view - About this book

Minimum Wages in Certain Territories, Possessions, and Oversea Areas of the ...

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor - 1956 - 418 pages
...exclude leased areas, such as the Bermuda base, in the word "possession" appears. We cannot even say, "We see what you are driving at, but you have not said it, and therefore we shall go on as before." " Under such circumstances, our duty as a Court is to construe the word "possession" as our judgment...
Full view - About this book




  1. My library
  2. Help
  3. Advanced Book Search
  4. Download EPUB
  5. Download PDF