Interstate Commerce Commission Reports: Reports and Decisions of the Interstate Commerce Commission of the United States

Front Cover
 

Contents

Acids Minimum Weight from Bartlesville Okla and Other
34
Anchor Coal Co v United States 25 F 2d 462_
40
Marble Products v Louisville N R Co 155 I C C 293 632
45
Andys Ridge Coal Co v Southern Ry Co 18 I C C 405
53
Bituminous Coal to C F A Territory 46 I C C 66
59
Canton R Co Oil Heat v_ 113
75
Railroad Comm of Mississippi v Aberdeen R R Co 474
82
Edwards Mfg Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co et al ___ 252
96
Pratt Lambert v New York Central R Co 96 I C C 460_
98
Peabody Lbr Co v Pennsylvania R Co 169 I C C 305__
135
Chain Iron and Steel 151 I C C 83 659
137
Maryland Co v Western Ry of Alabama 159 I C C 149_
140
El Paso Freight Bureau v InternationalG N R Co 684
147
Motor Co v V_
149
Chicago B Q R Co
155
Proposed Increases in New England 49 I C C 421 1794
158
Superior Zinc Corp v Pennsylvania R Co 221
171
Memphis Freight Bureau v
179
Mississippi Vegetable Shippers Bureau v Aberdeen R
186
Abilene S Ry Co 474
193
Tobacco Merchants Assn of United States v Aberdeen R
199
Missouri Gravel Co v Chicago B Q R Co 132 I C C
205
Rates and Rules on Shipments of PackingHouse Products i
207
Tamms Silica Co v Chicago E I Ry Co
212
Fargo N Dak Commercial Club v Ahnapee W Ry Co 301
227
Florida East Coast Ry Co Yellow Pine Co of Florida v 167
251
Atlas Metal Works v Akron C Y Ry Co
252
Missouri Interstate Rates between Points in
259
Missouri RiverNebraska Cases 40 I C C 201
265
Rate Structure Investigation
279
Nichols Wire Sheet Hardware Co v Atchison T S
280
MissouriK T R Co Gates Hardware Co v 611
298
Oyster Shells to Southern Territory 161 I C C 623
300
Adamston Flat Glass Co v Baltimore O R Co 635
301
Coal and Coal Briquettes to Southern Territory 525
319
CobbGywnn Tobacco Co v Atlantic Coast Line R Co
333
Alton E R Co 599
336
Blue Grass Flooring Co v Louisiana A Ry Co 161 I C C
343
Pacific Portland Cement Co v Western Pac R Co
345
Pacific Coast Fourth Section Applications 129 I C C 3
354
Union Sheep Co v Southern Pac Co
370
Boardman Co v Southern Pac Co 37 I C C 81 327
371
Gravel Crushed Stone and Sand from
373
Pierre Furniture Co v Chicago N W Ry Co 177 I C C
425
Atlanta W P R Co
435
Newport Coal Co v Louisville N R Co 756
440
Champion Coated Paper Co v Alabama Great Southern
449
Atlantic Y Ry Co Southern States Lbr Co V_ 75
463
Y Ry Co Atlas Metal Works v 252
474
Through Routes and Joint Rates between Inland Waterways
476
Trading
492
Rauh Sons Fertilizer Co v Baltimore O R Co 169
498
Paper and Pulpboard from Richmond Va to Eastern Trunk
501
Merry Bros Brick Tile Co v Atlantic Coast Line R Co
513
United Paperboard Co v Minneapolis St L R Co
597
Alabama T N R Corp Southeast Kansas v 259
599
Milton Sons v Alton S R 179 I C C 200
601
Pennsylvania R Co
603
Carpenter Paper Co v Chicago A R Co 171 I C C 783_
613
New York C St L R Co Ryan Co v 574
641
South Carolina Asparagus Growers Assn v Southern Ry
645
Cottonseed Oil from Southwestern Points to California_
651
Alton S R Sinclair Crude Oil Purchasing Co v 252
657
Need Co Abilene S Ry Co 474
664
Michigan Central R Co Herndon Fruit Co v
670
Republic Portland Cement Co v Gulf C S F RT Co
677
BarkerMiller Distributing Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 798
695
Peppard Seed Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 571
699
Cartier Sons Co v New York N H H R Co 157 I C
709
Richmond Mica Corp v Baltimore O R Co 195
718
S F Ry Co Republic Portland Cement Co v 677
719
Public Utilities Comm of State of Idaho v Oregon Short
731
St P P R Co North Pacific Millers Assn v
750
Pillsbury Flour Mills Co v Great Northern Ry Co 25
753
Chicago R I G Ry Co Nash Hardware Co v 252
756
Boldt Glass Co v Director General 64 I C C 619
757
Upson Co v Erie R Co 175
762
Salt Cake from to and between Southern Points
769
Commodity Rates between Points in Southern Territory
789
Bogota Paper Board Co v New York S W R Co ____ 69
791
Pitch and Tar
793
Class Rates to and from Nebraska Stations 301
797
Table of commodities
801
Table of localities
807
Index digest
855
Sampon Electric Co v Reading Co 492
857
American Cotton Waste Linter Exc v Chicago N
859
Pulaski Veneer Corp v Pennsylvania R Co 687
861
Odin Coal Co of Odin Ill v Illinois Central R Co 605
862
Boston Excelsior Co v Atlantic Coast Line R Co 537
864
Saniwax Paper Co v Ann Arbor R Co 556
867
American Tar Co v Boston M R 791
871
Richmond Mica Corp v
876
Croom Bros Georgia Southern Freight Bureau for Account
877
Sapulpa Okla Chamber of Commerce v St LouisS F
879
Sonboard Air Line Ry Co Gentile Bros Co v 125
883
International Agricultural Corp v Louisville N R Co 496
883
International Commerce Corp v Southern Pac Co 122
884
C St L Ry Co
886
Sioux City Chamber of Commerce Traffic Bureau v Aber
887
Ann Arbor R Co
888
International Motor Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 89
895
Bowersock Mills Power Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 451
897
Interstate Rates between Points in Missouri 259
901
Crushed Stone Sand and Gravel from
906
Western Salt Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 131
907
Wisconsin Steel Co v Chicago A R Co 252
917
W R Co Wyatt Metal Boiler Works v 252
925

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 389 - Water for yard locomotives Lubricants for yard locomotives Other supplies for yard locomotives Enginehouse expenses — yard Yard supplies and expenses Operating joint yards and terminals — Dr.
Page 523 - ... for a shorter than for a longer distance over the same line or route in the same direction...
Page 696 - That it shall be unlawful for any common carrier subject to the provisions of this act to make or give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any particular person, company, firm, corporation, or locality, or any particular description of traffic, in any respect whatsoever...
Page 33 - When the section says that no locality shall be subjected to any undue or unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage in any respect whatsoever, it does not mean that the commission is to regard only the welfare of the locality or community where the traffic originates, or where tbc goods are shipped on the cars.
Page 166 - It, the doubt must be a reasonable one: that the terms of a tariff must be taken In the sense in which they are generally understood and accepted commercially, and neither carriers nor shippers can be permitted to urge for their own purposes a strained and unnatural construction...
Page 420 - ... if a circuitous rail line or route is, because of such c,ircuity, granted authority to meet the charges of a more direct line or route to or from competitive points and to maintain higher charges to or from intermediate points on its line, the authority shall not include intermediate points as to which the haul of the petitioning line or route is not longer than that of the direct line or route between the competitive points...
Page 33 - ... be established upon distance alone; nor can one case be safely made the precedent for another. Much depends upon competitive conditions, and each situation must be considered and disposed of by itself. ******* "'In determining these differentials we must consider the interest of the consumer as well as the producer. Rates should be so adjusted as to permit the widest possible competition. * * * Coal rates are usually highly competitive. * * * The differentials from these different mines are the...
Page 329 - New York Central Railroad Company (The). New York, Chicago and St. Louis Railroad Company (The) . New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company (The) . Norfolk and Western Railway Company.
Page 273 - We believe, however, that this power should be sparingly exercised and only in cases where it clearly appears that its exercise is necessary in order that substantial public injury may be avoided.
Page 58 - ... destination, but were held at a place outside of Chicago. The facts are these: The storage tracks of the railroad for cars billed to Chicago for reconsignment were at Hammond, Indiana, a considerable distance from the terminals of the company nearer the center of the city, but were convenient to the belt line by which cars could be transferred to any desired new destination, and the holding on such tracks of cars consigned as were those in question was in accordance with Argument for Plaintiff...

Bibliographic information