Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

530

** Trinidad Asphalt Manufacturing Company. Standard Paint Company v..

U.

* Underwood Typewriter Company v. A. B. Dick Company.

d Union Typewriter Co. v. L. C. Smith & Bros. Typewriter Co. et al.
** United States, The, v. Johnson...

* United States of America v. Antikamnia Chemical Company.
a United States ex rel. Lang v. Moore, Commissioner of Patents.
*United States ex rel. Lang v. Moore, Commissioner of Patents.

V.

* Val Blatz Brewing Company. Star Brewery Company v.
Van Yorx.
Ex parte.

Von Keller v. Hayden v. Kruh v. Jackson..

W.

Wm. A. Coombs Milling Company v. Barber Milling Company..
Wm. A. Coombs Milling Company v. The Dewey Bros. Company.
Walker and Walker v. Gilchrist..

* Walter Baker & Company, Limited. Nestlé and Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk

Company v....

Ward v. Midgley..

d Warren Axe & Tool Company. Langan v

Watters. Ex parte.

Wayne Poultry Tonic Co. Ex parte...

Weber and Swaller. Ex parte..

Weil and Grant. Ex parte...

Weithaler. Ex parte.

** Werckmeister. The American Lithographic Company v..

Western Electric Company. Ex parte

d Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. Allis-Chalmers Co. v..

c Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. et al v. Ohio Brass Co...

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

* Williams. Manly v.....

Willowcraft Shops, The. Ex parte.

Windhorst & Company. Ex parte.....

d Winona Interurban Ry. Co. et al. General Electric Co. v....

Wlost. Ex parte.

[blocks in formation]

298

452

564

357

253

443

326

97

217

27, 58

129

41

369

229

490

21

37

226

249

238

572

221

480

259

218

131

26

397

96

33

467, 499

57

49

235

383

109

73

103

INDEX OF CASES CITED.

[Opinions of the Attorney General are indicated by a double dagger (†); decisions of the State courts by a
section mark (§); of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia by the letter a; of the United States
district courts by the letter b; of the United States circuit courts by the letter c; of the Court of Appeals
of the District of Columbia by a star (*); of the United States circuit courts of appeal by the letter d
and of the Supreme Court of the United States by two stars (**).]

A.

Page.

d A. Bauer & Co. v. La Société Anonyme de la Distillerie de la Liqueur Bene-
dictine de l'Abbaye de Fécamp, 120 Fed. Rep., 74..

356

d A. Bauer & Co. v. Order Carthusian Monks, 120 Fed. Rep., 78..
*A. G. Spalding & Bros., 27 App. D. C., 314..

558

31

d A. J. McDonald & Morris Mfg. Co. v. H. Meuller Mfg. Co., 183 Fed. Rep., 972.
** Adams v. Bellaire Stamping Co., 141 U. S., 539..

242

459

Alart and McGuire. Ex parte, C. D., 1907, 409; 131 O. G., 2145...

c Albers Bros. Milling Co. v. Acme Mills Co., 171 Fed. Rep., 989..
Albert. Ex parte, C. D., 1901, 66; 96 O. G., 426..

52

369

220

**

* Anti-Cori-Zine Chemical Company.

** Atlantic Works v. Brady, 107 U. S., 192....

* Allen v. Lowry, 26 App. D. C., 8.....

* American Stove Co. v. Detroit Stove Works, 31 App. D. C., 304

d American Sulphite Co. v. Howland Falls Co., 80 Fed. Rep., 395..
** American Tobacco Company v. Werckmeister, 207 U. S., 284.
Ames v. Lindstrom, C. D., 1911, 68; 167 O. G., 241..
Amey v. Long, 9 East., 484..

Amoskeag Manufacturing Company v. Spear, 2 Sandford's Supreme Court,
599..

c Andrews v. Cross, 8 Fed. Rep., 269.

In re, 34 App. D. C., 191......

c Appert v. Brownsville Plate Glass Co., Schmertz v. Appert, 44 Fed. Rep., 115..
*Artesian Mfg. Co. In re, 37 App. D. C., 113....

d Automatic Weighing Machine Co. v. Pneumatic Scale Corporation, 166 Fed.
Rep., 288....

352

372

376, 379

574

384

575

533

543

194, 406

95

100

177

68, 70, 72, 416

B.

Babcock v. Picard v. Ashton and Curtis, 95 Ms. Dec., 378...
Barnitz. Ex parte, C. D., 1887, 130; 41 O. G., 575.

Barsaloux, James and Lyon. 16 Opinions Atty. Gen., 116.

113

62

250

* Battle Creek Sanitarium Co., Ltd., v. Fuller, 30 App. D. C., 411..

Beach v. Fowler, C. D., 1899, 187; 48 O. G., 821....

[blocks in formation]

c Benjamin Electric Manufacturing Co. v. Dole Co. et al., 141 Fed. Rep., 989..
d Benjamin Electric Manufacturing Co. v. Dole Co. et al., 158 Fed. Rep., 617..
d Bennett et al. v. McKinley et al, 65 Fed. Rep., 505...

e Bernardin v. Northall, 77 Fed. Rep., 849.....

* Bernardin v. Seymour, 10 App. D. C., 294..

Bissell Carpet Sweeper Company. Ex parte, C. D., 1903, 190; 101 O. G., 2148,
2149....

Bitner. Ex parte, C. D., 1909, 32; 140 O. G., 256..
* Blackford v. Wilder, 28 App. D. C., 535..

Blackman v. Alexander, C. D., 1903, 288; 105 O. G., 2059...

Bliss v. Creveling, C. D., 1904, 381; 112 O. G., 499.

* Bliss v. McElroy, 29 App. D. C., 120....
Block. Ex parte, C. D., 1905, 493; 119 O. G., 963...

* Bluthenthal & Bickart v. Bigbie Bros. & Co., 30 App. D. C., 118..
* Bluthenthal & Bickart v. Bigbie Bros. & Co., 33 App. D. C., 209.
§ Board of Supervisors v. Magoon, 109 Ill., 142 ...
Böhlecke. Ex parte, C. D., 1901, 239; 97 O. G., 2743.
** Bolles v. Outing Company, 175 U. S., 262.......
** Bong v. Campbell Art Co., 214 U. S., 236...
Bourne. Ex parte, C. D., 1904, 247; 110 O. G., 2510....
Bratt. Ex parte, C. D., 1910, 46; 152 O. G., 958.
* Braunstein v. Holmes, 30 App. D. C., 328.
Briggs v. Conley, C. D., 1903, 158; 104 O. G., 1119..

d Brina v. United States, 179 Fed. Rep., 373...
Brissenden v. Roesch, C. D., 1905, 440; 118 O. G., 2253..

* Broadwell v. Long, 36 App. D. C., 418...

** Brown v. Davis, 116 U. S., 237..

d Brown v. Stilwell, 57 Fed. Rep., 731..

** Brown v. Walker, 161 U. S., 594..

** Brown Chemical Company v. Meyer, 139 U. S., 540..
Buchanan. Ex parte, C. D., 1891, 104; 56 O. G., 140. . .
Buchanan-Anderson-Nelson Co., The, v. Breen and Kennedy, 27 App. D. C.,

573....

Bullock. Ex parte, C. D., 1907, 93; 127 O. G., 1580..
Burge. Ex parte, C. D., 1907, 208; 129 O. G., 1611..
Burrowes. Ex parte, C. D., 1904, 155; 110 O. G., 599.
Burson. Ex parte, C. D., 1892, 53; 58 O. G., 1414..
* Burson v. Vogel, 29 App. D. C., 388..

c Butler v. Shaw, 21 Fed. Rep., 321..

** Butterworth v. Hoe, 112 U. S., 50..

C.

C. H. Alden Co. Ex parte, C. D., 1907, 423; 131 O. G., 2419..

* Cahn, Belt & Company. In re, 27 App. D. C., 173.

** Canal Company v. Clark, 13 Wall., 311...

b Cantelo Mfg. Co. In re, 185 Fed. Rep., 276...

** Carnegie Steel Company v. Cambria Iron Company, 185 U. S., 403.
**Carpenter v. Winn, 221 U. S., 553.....

* Carty v. Kellogg, 7 App. D. C., 542..

* Central Consumers Co. In re, 32 App. D. C., 523.

§ Chadwick v. Covell, 151 Mass., 190..

**Champion v. Ames, 188 U. S., 331.

Christensen. Ex parte, G. D., 1903, 256; 105 O. G., 1261..

Page.
219

219

17

95

451

109

247

42, 98

229

132

441, 442

263
28

28

291

263

574

361

20

220

339

229

57

229

115

402

377

576

345

136, 137

342

201, 243, 244

209
103
249
353, 443
94, 95
94, 95

345
51
532, 557
123
177
575
72

194, 222, 406

551
572

244

c Church v. Hubbart, 2 Cranch., 187, 236...

838.

Clausen. Ex parte, C. D., 1905, 367; 118 O. G.,
d Cleveland Foundry Co. v. Detroit Vapor Stove Co., 131 Fed. Rep., 853....
** Coffey v. United States, 116 U. S., 436...
**Cohn v. United States Corset Co., 93 U. S., 366.
Collins. Ex parte, C. D., 1901, 181; 97 O. G., 1372..
d Columbia Chemical Co. v. Duff, 184 Fed. Rep., 876..
**Columbia Mill Company v. Alcorn, 150 U. S., 460..
**Commissioner of Patents v. Whitely, 4 Wall., 532..

**Computing Scale Co. v. Automatic Scale Co., 204 U. S., 609.
c Conroy v. Penn Electrical & Mfg. Co., 155 Fed. Rep., 421.
d Conroy v. Penn Electrical & Mfg. Co., 159 Fed. Rep., 943..
c Conroy v. Penn Electrical & Mfg. Co., 173 Fed. Rep., 299..

c Conroy v. Penn Electrical & Mfg. Co., 181 Fed. Rep., 697.
**Consolidated Fruit-Jar Co. v. Wright, 94 U. S., 92, 96.

d Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. et al. v. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York, 157
Fed. Rep., 677.....

d Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. et al. v. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York, 162
Fed. Rep., 892....

d Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Finlay Rubber Tire Co., 116 Fed. Rep., 629..
c Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 147 Fed. Rep.,
739.....

d Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 151 Fed. Rep.,
237...

** Coon v. Wilson, 113 U. S., 268.

d Coopersville Cooperative Creamery Co. v. Lemon, 163 Fed. Rep., 145..
Copeland. Ex parte, C. D., 1909, 239; 149 O. G., 309.

** Corbin Cabinet Lock Co. v. Eagle Lock Co., 150 U. S., 38.

* Cosper v. Gold, 34 App. D. C., 198..

* Cosper v. Gold and Gold, 34 App. D. C., 194.

Cottrell. Ex parte, C. D., 1911, 86; 169 O. G., 203..

* Couch v. Barnett, 23 App. D. C., 446.

** Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U. S., 547..

Couper and Somers v. Bannister, C. D., 1904, 424; 112 O. G., 1480 .
Crain. Ex parte, C. D., 1907, 18; 126 O. G., 758...

* Crescent Typewriter Supply Co. In re, 30 App. D. C., 324..
Cridland. Ex parte, 3 Ves. & B., 94, 99 ...
Crocker. Ex parte, MS. Appeal cases, vol. 4, 269.
Curtis v. de Ferranti v. Lindmark, C. D., 1911, 115; 171 O. G., 215 .
Cutler. Ex parte, 92 MS. Dec., 99..

* Cutler v. Leonard, 31 App. D. C., 297.

D.

c Dadirrian v. Yacubian et al., 72 Fed. Rep., 1010..

** Dainese v. Hale, 91 U. S., 13, 20, 21...

Page.

123

263

543

156, 157

275

263

493

557

310

458

493

493

493

493

158

a Dann. In re, 129 Fed. Rep., 495.

* Dashiell v. Tasker, 21 App. D. C., 64.

* Davenport. In re, 23 App. D. C., 370.
*Davis v. Garrett, 28 App. D. C., 9..

* Degge v. Hitchcock, 35 App. D. C., 218..

* Dennehy v. Robertson, 32 App. D. C., 355.
Dieterich. Ex parte, C. D., 1909, 82; 142 O. G., 568.

539

539

539

539

539

345, 347
361
21, 22
458, 509
388
309, 388, 391

408
321

576

449

218, 219

225

123

250

433

201, 243

127, 402

81, 82
123

122
5

266

68, 72, 73, 180, 384, 387

289
406

103

Pago.

* Dilg. In re, 25 App. D. C., 9...............

* District of Columbia v. Brooke, 29 App. D. C., 563.

318

290

Dittgen v. Parmenter, C. D., 1903, 125 103 O. G., 1164..

Dixon and Marsh v. Graves and Whittemore, C. D., 1907, 101; 127 O. G., 1993..

d Dixon-Woods Co. v. Pfeifer, 55 Fed. Rep., 390..
Doble v. Henry, C. D., 1905, 429; 118 O. G., 2249..

128

25

543

66, 67

[blocks in formation]

Dr. Pepper Company, The. Ex parte, C. D., 1905, 158; 116 O. G., 593.
** Duer v. Corbin Cabinet Lock Company, 149 U. S., 216..
Dunker v. Reist, C. D., 1905, 533; 119 O. G., 1925.

E.

* E. McIlhenny's Son v. New Iberia Extract of Tabasco Pepper Co., Limited,
30 App. D. C., 337..

345

459

113

298, 299

* McIlhenny v. New Iberia Extract of Tabasco Pepper Co., 34 App. D. C., 430..
Eagle. Ex parte, C. D., 1870, 137

237

218, 219

c Eagle Wagon Works v. Columbia Wagon Works, 181 Fed. Rep., 148..
**Eames v. Andrews, 122 U. S., 40....

480

543, 546

*Eastwood. In re, 33 App. D. C., 291...

268

* Ehret v. Star Brewery Co., 31 App. D. C., 507..

Eickemeyer. Ex parte, C. D., 1902, 174; 99 O. G., 1622..
**Electric Gas Co. v. Boston Electric Co., 139 U. S., 481

** Elgin National Watch Company v. Illinois Watch Company, 179 U. S., 665..

* Ellis. In re, 37 App. D. C., 203.

Empire Knife Company. Ex parte C. D., 1909, 135; 145 O. G., 763.

[blocks in formation]

F. Blumenthal & Co., Ex parte, C. D., 1907, 302; 130 O. G., 2068..

* Faber. In re, 31 App. D. C., 531..

d Fairbank Co. v. Luckel et al., 102 Fed Rep., 327..

** Farmers' Friend Co. v. Challenge Co., 128 U. S., 506..

Farnham. Ex parte, C. D., 1905, 62; 114 O. G., 2090..
* de Ferranti v. Lindmark, 30 App. D. C., 417.

** Field v. Clark, 143 U. S., 470..

§ Filley v. Fassett, 44 Mo., 173..

Flomerfelt. Ex parte, C. D., 1895, 101; 73 O. G., 1411.

d Florence Manufacturing Co. v. Dowd, 178 Fed. Rep., 73.

Ford v. Foster, L. R., 7 Ch. App., 611, 628..

Fowler. Ex parte, C. D., 1907, 88; 127 O. G., 1578..

*Foster v. Antisdel, 14 App. D. C., 552..

** Frasch v. Moore, 211 U. S., 1...

Frederick v. Frederick, C. D., 1902, 182; 99 O. G., 1865..

** Freeman v. Asmus, 145 U. S., 226.......

** French Republic v. Saratoga Vichy Springs Co., 191 U. S., 427.

Fritts. Ex parte, C. D., 1902, 383; 101 O. G., 1131..

225

429, 431

265

345, 347

239

119

361

372

238

357, 406

328

3

209

93, 94

129

524, 527

328

263

« PreviousContinue »