 | 1849 - 716 pages
...Constitution, which declares that " no private or local bill which may be passed by the Legislature shall embrace more than one subject, which shall be expressed in the title," has had the effect of preventing all riders, as they are called, or tacking together several bills... | |
 | Freeman Hunt, Thomas Prentice Kettell, William Buck Dana - 1849 - 710 pages
...Constitution, which declares that " no private or local bill which may be passed by the Legislature shall embrace more than one subject, which shall be expressed in the title," has had the effect of preventing all riders, as they are called, or tacking together several bills... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1863 - 622 pages
...not to conflict with that provision of the constitution, which declares that no private or local law shall embrace more than .one subject, which shall be expressed in the title. Ibid. 534. CONFESSIONS OF JUDGMENT. 1. A judgment cannot be confessed on the day a warrant of attorney... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, Erasmus Peshine Smith, George Franklin Comstock, Henry Rogers Selden, Francis Kernan, Joel Tiffany, Samuel Hand - 1870 - 704 pages
...Cal, 613, 630.) It is void, as in violation of the constitutional requirement that no private or local bill shall embrace more than one subject, which shall be expressed in the title. (People v. Statement of case. HiU, 35 K Y., 449 ; People v. Brien, 38 NY, 193.) And the act of 1860... | |
 | South Carolina. Supreme Court, J. S. G. Richardson, Robert Wallace Shand, Cyprian Melanchthon Efird, William Hay Townsend, Duncan C. Ray, William Munro Shand - 1916 - 644 pages
...CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION. — The purpose of Const., art. Ill, sec. 17, declaring that statutes shall relate to one subject, which shall be expressed in the title, is to prevent insertion of matters not germane to the general subject, and to prevent surreptitious legislation.... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1875 - 674 pages
...Met. Ky. 566 ; Chiles v. Monroe, 4 Met. Ky. 72. The constitutional inhibition in Minnesota is, "no law shall embrace more than one subject, which shall be expressed in the title." In The State, ex rel. Stuart, v. Kinsella, 14 Minn. 524, the court say : " The exigencies of legislation... | |
 | 1906 - 1166 pages
...the amendment to section 5 was invalid because not included in the title within Const, art. 2. S 19, providing that no bill shall embrace more than one subject, which shall be expressed in the title. 4. SAME— INVALIDITY IN PART — EFFECT. The invalidity of section 5, Laws 1905, pp. 360--3G5, c.... | |
 | 1901 - 1164 pages
...for, both arson and an attempt to commit arson, is not in violation of Const, art. 2, § 19, declaring that no bill shall embrace more than one subject, which shall be expressed in the title. 2. 2 Ballinger's Ann. Codes & St. § 4748, provides that no person shall be summoned as а petit juror... | |
 | 1902 - 1166 pages
...Minnesota, in commenting on a section of the constitution of that state which provides that "no law shall embrace more than one subject, which shall be expressed in the title," said: "It [said provision] was not intended to embarrass legislation by making laws more restrictive... | |
 | 1913 - 1154 pages
...136-139, 196; Dec. Dig. § 109.*] 2. STATUTES (f 137*)— TITLE— REQUISITES. Under Const, art. 2, § 19, providing that no bill shall embrace more than one subject, which shall he expressed in the title, the title of Act March 22, 1895 (Laws 1895, c. 165), entitled "An act to... | |
| |
No bill which may be enacted into law shall embrace more than one subject which shall be expressed in the title of the bill. 
