Social PsychologyMcGraw-Hill, 1983 - 674 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 82
Page 80
... consider three illustrations . One is the “ Peter Principle ” : that people who do well on a job are promoted until they reach a position in which they are incompetent ( Peter & Hull , 1969 ) . When this happens , the managers who made ...
... consider three illustrations . One is the “ Peter Principle ” : that people who do well on a job are promoted until they reach a position in which they are incompetent ( Peter & Hull , 1969 ) . When this happens , the managers who made ...
Page 172
... consider it good manners to cut the meat and then transfer the fork to the right hand : " I agree . It is inefficient . But it's the way we do it . ” Cultural norms may seem arbitrary and confining . However , just as a play moves ...
... consider it good manners to cut the meat and then transfer the fork to the right hand : " I agree . It is inefficient . But it's the way we do it . ” Cultural norms may seem arbitrary and confining . However , just as a play moves ...
Page 186
... considering sex - role indoctrination , let's first consider what there is to explain : How different are men and women ? And to what extent do biological factors fail to explain male - female differences ? Discerning answers to these ...
... considering sex - role indoctrination , let's first consider what there is to explain : How different are men and women ? And to what extent do biological factors fail to explain male - female differences ? Discerning answers to these ...
Contents
How we do social psychology | 8 |
Social psychology and human values | 24 |
Does our behavior determine our attitudes? | 44 |
Copyright | |
30 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
actions actually aggression altruism American answer arousal asked attitudes attractive attribution error behavior believe Berkowitz biases Bibb Latané Chapter communication conflict conformity correlation culture decision deindividuation desegregation differences dissonance effect emotional evaluated example expectations experimenter experiments explain factors favor feel female FIGURE frustration fundamental attribution error group polarization groupthink hindsight bias hostility human illusory correlation indicate individual influence ingroup bias interaction Journal of Personality judgments jurors jury laboratory Lee Ross less male norms observed one's overjustification effect participants people's perceived percent Perhaps Personality and Social persuasive phenomenon positive predict prejudice questions racial recall relationship responses rewards self-esteem self-perception theory self-serving bias sex roles shock similar Similarly situation social facilitation social loafing Social Psychology someone sometimes stereotypes suggest teachers television tend tendency theory thinking University victim vivid woman women