Social PsychologyMcGraw-Hill, 1983 - 674 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 81
Page 110
... evidence which confirmed their belief , but were sharply critical of the " disconfirming " evidence . Showing the two sides an identical body of mixed evidence had therefore not narrowed their disagreement , but increased it . Each side ...
... evidence which confirmed their belief , but were sharply critical of the " disconfirming " evidence . Showing the two sides an identical body of mixed evidence had therefore not narrowed their disagreement , but increased it . Each side ...
Page 571
... evidence such as the defendant's previous convictions . In one study , Stanley Sue , Ronald Smith , and Cathy Caldwell ( 1973 ) gave University of Washington students a description of a grocery store robbery - murder and a summary of ...
... evidence such as the defendant's previous convictions . In one study , Stanley Sue , Ronald Smith , and Cathy Caldwell ( 1973 ) gave University of Washington students a description of a grocery store robbery - murder and a summary of ...
Page 575
... evidence is made ambiguous that researchers find jurors ' personalities and general attitudes having much effect . Variations in the situation , especially in the evidence , generally have far more effect . That echoes a conclusion ...
... evidence is made ambiguous that researchers find jurors ' personalities and general attitudes having much effect . Variations in the situation , especially in the evidence , generally have far more effect . That echoes a conclusion ...
Contents
How we do social psychology | 8 |
Social psychology and human values | 24 |
Does our behavior determine our attitudes? | 44 |
Copyright | |
30 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
actions actually aggression altruism American answer arousal asked attitudes attractive attribution error behavior believe Berkowitz biases Bibb Latané Chapter communication conflict conformity correlation culture decision deindividuation desegregation differences dissonance effect emotional evaluated example expectations experimenter experiments explain factors favor feel female FIGURE frustration fundamental attribution error group polarization groupthink hindsight bias hostility human illusory correlation indicate individual influence ingroup bias interaction Journal of Personality judgments jurors jury laboratory Lee Ross less male norms observed one's overjustification effect participants people's perceived percent Perhaps Personality and Social persuasive phenomenon positive predict prejudice questions racial recall relationship responses rewards self-esteem self-perception theory self-serving bias sex roles shock similar Similarly situation social facilitation social loafing Social Psychology someone sometimes stereotypes suggest teachers television tend tendency theory thinking University victim vivid woman women