Social PsychologyMcGraw-Hill, 1983 - 674 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 94
Page 68
... explain all the findings . When people argue a position that is in line with their opinion , although a step or two beyond it , procedures that usually eliminate any arousal don't seem to reduce the change in one's attitudes ( Fazio ...
... explain all the findings . When people argue a position that is in line with their opinion , although a step or two beyond it , procedures that usually eliminate any arousal don't seem to reduce the change in one's attitudes ( Fazio ...
Page 93
... explain some imaginary events . When asked to explain why “ Ted dislikes you , ” they were much less likely to hold themselves responsible ( “ This Ted guy must have a chip on his shoulder ” ) than when asked to explain why “ Ted likes ...
... explain some imaginary events . When asked to explain why “ Ted dislikes you , ” they were much less likely to hold themselves responsible ( “ This Ted guy must have a chip on his shoulder ” ) than when asked to explain why “ Ted likes ...
Page 112
... explain the relationship ? ( The point of the example was that people who actively explain something are the most likely to remember it . ) Now let me clear the record by confessing that the investigators in that study actually had no ...
... explain the relationship ? ( The point of the example was that people who actively explain something are the most likely to remember it . ) Now let me clear the record by confessing that the investigators in that study actually had no ...
Contents
How we do social psychology | 8 |
Social psychology and human values | 24 |
Does our behavior determine our attitudes? | 44 |
Copyright | |
30 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
actions actually aggression altruism American answer arousal asked attitudes attractive attribution error behavior believe Berkowitz biases Bibb Latané Chapter communication conflict conformity correlation culture decision deindividuation desegregation differences dissonance effect emotional evaluated example expectations experimenter experiments explain factors favor feel female FIGURE frustration fundamental attribution error group polarization groupthink hindsight bias hostility human illusory correlation indicate individual influence ingroup bias interaction Journal of Personality judgments jurors jury laboratory Lee Ross less male norms observed one's overjustification effect participants people's perceived percent Perhaps Personality and Social persuasive phenomenon positive predict prejudice questions racial recall relationship responses rewards self-esteem self-perception theory self-serving bias sex roles shock similar Similarly situation social facilitation social loafing Social Psychology someone sometimes stereotypes suggest teachers television tend tendency theory thinking University victim vivid woman women