Social PsychologyMcGraw-Hill, 1983 - 674 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 81
Page 20
... individuals in small groups were asked to simultaneously administer punishing shocks to a hapless victim , without knowing which of them were actually shocking the victim ? Would these individuals administer stronger shock than individuals ...
... individuals in small groups were asked to simultaneously administer punishing shocks to a hapless victim , without knowing which of them were actually shocking the victim ? Would these individuals administer stronger shock than individuals ...
Page 122
... individuals as instead to be influenced by individuals and not merely as statistical units . But a problem arises when we distinctive features of the formulate our beliefs about people in general from our observations of particular case ...
... individuals as instead to be influenced by individuals and not merely as statistical units . But a problem arises when we distinctive features of the formulate our beliefs about people in general from our observations of particular case ...
Page 304
... individuals are open to evaluation only when acting alone . The group situation ( rope pulling , shouting , and so forth ) decreases evaluation apprehension ; when individuals are not accountable , responsibility is diffused across all ...
... individuals are open to evaluation only when acting alone . The group situation ( rope pulling , shouting , and so forth ) decreases evaluation apprehension ; when individuals are not accountable , responsibility is diffused across all ...
Contents
How we do social psychology | 8 |
Social psychology and human values | 24 |
Does our behavior determine our attitudes? | 44 |
Copyright | |
30 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
actions actually aggression altruism American answer arousal asked attitudes attractive attribution error behavior believe Berkowitz biases Bibb Latané Chapter communication conflict conformity correlation culture decision deindividuation desegregation differences dissonance effect emotional evaluated example expectations experimenter experiments explain factors favor feel female FIGURE frustration fundamental attribution error group polarization groupthink hindsight bias hostility human illusory correlation indicate individual influence ingroup bias interaction Journal of Personality judgments jurors jury laboratory Lee Ross less male norms observed one's overjustification effect participants people's perceived percent Perhaps Personality and Social persuasive phenomenon positive predict prejudice questions racial recall relationship responses rewards self-esteem self-perception theory self-serving bias sex roles shock similar Similarly situation social facilitation social loafing Social Psychology someone sometimes stereotypes suggest teachers television tend tendency theory thinking University victim vivid woman women