Social PsychologyMcGraw-Hill, 1983 - 674 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 92
Page 248
... influence : Conformity that results from accepting evidence about reality provided by other people . Informational influence on the other hand , is more likely to produce acceptance . When reality is ambiguous , as it was for subjects ...
... influence : Conformity that results from accepting evidence about reality provided by other people . Informational influence on the other hand , is more likely to produce acceptance . When reality is ambiguous , as it was for subjects ...
Page 296
... influence one another . In this chapter , we will first consider three examples of such collective influence : social facilitation , social loafing , and deindividuation . These phenomena transpire in situations that involve minimal ...
... influence one another . In this chapter , we will first consider three examples of such collective influence : social facilitation , social loafing , and deindividuation . These phenomena transpire in situations that involve minimal ...
Page 327
... INFLUENCE Each of the four chapters in this unit on social influence has concluded with a reminder of our power as individuals . We have seen that while cultural situations mold us , we also help create and choose these very situations ...
... INFLUENCE Each of the four chapters in this unit on social influence has concluded with a reminder of our power as individuals . We have seen that while cultural situations mold us , we also help create and choose these very situations ...
Contents
How we do social psychology | 8 |
Social psychology and human values | 24 |
Does our behavior determine our attitudes? | 44 |
Copyright | |
30 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
actions actually aggression altruism American answer arousal asked attitudes attractive attribution error behavior believe Berkowitz biases Bibb Latané Chapter communication conflict conformity correlation culture decision deindividuation desegregation differences dissonance effect emotional evaluated example expectations experimenter experiments explain factors favor feel female FIGURE frustration fundamental attribution error group polarization groupthink hindsight bias hostility human illusory correlation indicate individual influence ingroup bias interaction Journal of Personality judgments jurors jury laboratory Lee Ross less male norms observed one's overjustification effect participants people's perceived percent Perhaps Personality and Social persuasive phenomenon positive predict prejudice questions racial recall relationship responses rewards self-esteem self-perception theory self-serving bias sex roles shock similar Similarly situation social facilitation social loafing Social Psychology someone sometimes stereotypes suggest teachers television tend tendency theory thinking University victim vivid woman women