Social PsychologyMcGraw-Hill, 1983 - 674 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 85
Page 10
... percent confident of describing the entire population with an error margin of 3 percent or less . To visualize this , imagine a huge jar filled with beans — 50 percent red and 50 percent white . Someone who randomly samples 1200 of ...
... percent confident of describing the entire population with an error margin of 3 percent or less . To visualize this , imagine a huge jar filled with beans — 50 percent red and 50 percent white . Someone who randomly samples 1200 of ...
Page 89
... percent as below average . Sixty percent reported themselves as better than average in " athletic ability , ” only 6 percent as below average . In " ability to get along with others , " zero percent of the 829,000 students who responded ...
... percent as below average . Sixty percent reported themselves as better than average in " athletic ability , ” only 6 percent as below average . In " ability to get along with others , " zero percent of the 829,000 students who responded ...
Page 426
... Percent 20 40 60 80 100 Percent Percent FIGURE 12-3 Neighborhood preferences of white Detroit area residents . People were shown diagrams representing neighborhoods of different racial mixes ( combinations of black houses and white ...
... Percent 20 40 60 80 100 Percent Percent FIGURE 12-3 Neighborhood preferences of white Detroit area residents . People were shown diagrams representing neighborhoods of different racial mixes ( combinations of black houses and white ...
Contents
How we do social psychology | 8 |
Social psychology and human values | 24 |
Does our behavior determine our attitudes? | 44 |
Copyright | |
30 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
actions actually aggression altruism American answer arousal asked attitudes attractive attribution error behavior believe Berkowitz biases Bibb Latané Chapter communication conflict conformity correlation culture decision deindividuation desegregation differences dissonance effect emotional evaluated example expectations experimenter experiments explain factors favor feel female FIGURE frustration fundamental attribution error group polarization groupthink hindsight bias hostility human illusory correlation indicate individual influence ingroup bias interaction Journal of Personality judgments jurors jury laboratory Lee Ross less male norms observed one's overjustification effect participants people's perceived percent Perhaps Personality and Social persuasive phenomenon positive predict prejudice questions racial recall relationship responses rewards self-esteem self-perception theory self-serving bias sex roles shock similar Similarly situation social facilitation social loafing Social Psychology someone sometimes stereotypes suggest teachers television tend tendency theory thinking University victim vivid woman women