Social PsychologyMcGraw-Hill, 1983 - 674 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 84
Page 112
... person has conjured up a rationale for it . In each experiment , first a belief was established , either by proclaiming it true ( as with our fire hydrants and crime example ) or else by inducing the person to conclude its truth after ...
... person has conjured up a rationale for it . In each experiment , first a belief was established , either by proclaiming it true ( as with our fire hydrants and crime example ) or else by inducing the person to conclude its truth after ...
Page 265
... person does more to boost our confidence . After all , a dissimilar person provides a more independent judgment . In a laboratory test , Goethals and Nelson confirmed this idea that similar communicators are much more effective on ...
... person does more to boost our confidence . After all , a dissimilar person provides a more independent judgment . In a laboratory test , Goethals and Nelson confirmed this idea that similar communicators are much more effective on ...
Page 328
... person to lead the sales force may not be the best person to captain the bowling team charismatic leaders tend to have an unshakable faith in their cause , utter confidence in their ability to succeed , and an ability to communicate ...
... person to lead the sales force may not be the best person to captain the bowling team charismatic leaders tend to have an unshakable faith in their cause , utter confidence in their ability to succeed , and an ability to communicate ...
Contents
How we do social psychology | 8 |
Social psychology and human values | 24 |
Does our behavior determine our attitudes? | 44 |
Copyright | |
30 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
actions actually aggression altruism American answer arousal asked attitudes attractive attribution error behavior believe Berkowitz biases Bibb Latané Chapter communication conflict conformity correlation culture decision deindividuation desegregation differences dissonance effect emotional evaluated example expectations experimenter experiments explain factors favor feel female FIGURE frustration fundamental attribution error group polarization groupthink hindsight bias hostility human illusory correlation indicate individual influence ingroup bias interaction Journal of Personality judgments jurors jury laboratory Lee Ross less male norms observed one's overjustification effect participants people's perceived percent Perhaps Personality and Social persuasive phenomenon positive predict prejudice questions racial recall relationship responses rewards self-esteem self-perception theory self-serving bias sex roles shock similar Similarly situation social facilitation social loafing Social Psychology someone sometimes stereotypes suggest teachers television tend tendency theory thinking University victim vivid woman women