Social PsychologyMcGraw-Hill, 1983 - 674 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 92
Page 19
... predict observed phenomena . Some people wonder why social psychologists are so preoccupied with their theories : Why don't Marcus Aurelius , they just gather facts ? In response , our aeronautical engineering analogy is Meditations ...
... predict observed phenomena . Some people wonder why social psychologists are so preoccupied with their theories : Why don't Marcus Aurelius , they just gather facts ? In response , our aeronautical engineering analogy is Meditations ...
Page 41
... predict behavior . But attitudes did predict behavior in all twenty - six studies they could find in which the measured attitude corresponded closely to the situation being considered . For example , we can expect that attitudes toward ...
... predict behavior . But attitudes did predict behavior in all twenty - six studies they could find in which the measured attitude corresponded closely to the situation being considered . For example , we can expect that attitudes toward ...
Page 250
... predict much of the variation in people's social behavior ( W. Mischel , 1968 ) . If you want to know how conforming ... predict behavior . Yet , as Chapter 2 indicated , our dismay prompted a search for the circumstances under which ...
... predict much of the variation in people's social behavior ( W. Mischel , 1968 ) . If you want to know how conforming ... predict behavior . Yet , as Chapter 2 indicated , our dismay prompted a search for the circumstances under which ...
Contents
How we do social psychology | 8 |
Social psychology and human values | 24 |
Does our behavior determine our attitudes? | 44 |
Copyright | |
30 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
actions actually aggression altruism American answer arousal asked attitudes attractive attribution error behavior believe Berkowitz biases Bibb Latané Chapter communication conflict conformity correlation culture decision deindividuation desegregation differences dissonance effect emotional evaluated example expectations experimenter experiments explain factors favor feel female FIGURE frustration fundamental attribution error group polarization groupthink hindsight bias hostility human illusory correlation indicate individual influence ingroup bias interaction Journal of Personality judgments jurors jury laboratory Lee Ross less male norms observed one's overjustification effect participants people's perceived percent Perhaps Personality and Social persuasive phenomenon positive predict prejudice questions racial recall relationship responses rewards self-esteem self-perception theory self-serving bias sex roles shock similar Similarly situation social facilitation social loafing Social Psychology someone sometimes stereotypes suggest teachers television tend tendency theory thinking University victim vivid woman women