Social PsychologyMcGraw-Hill, 1983 - 674 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 88
Page 114
... recall them in ways compatible with what we already believe . Thus we much more readily incorporate a new fact within our beliefs than revise our beliefs in light of the fact ( Tversky & Kahneman , 1980 ) , and we best remember ...
... recall them in ways compatible with what we already believe . Thus we much more readily incorporate a new fact within our beliefs than revise our beliefs in light of the fact ( Tversky & Kahneman , 1980 ) , and we best remember ...
Page 126
... recall from it . Those who read an abstract description of what happens when a Coast Guard regulation is broken recalled only 27 percent of the words afterwards : If a new Seaman Apprentice breaks a Coast Guard regulation , and this ...
... recall from it . Those who read an abstract description of what happens when a Coast Guard regulation is broken recalled only 27 percent of the words afterwards : If a new Seaman Apprentice breaks a Coast Guard regulation , and this ...
Page 160
... recall behaviors that were relevant to a job for which she was being considered . Those who evaluated her for a job as “ research librarian ” recalled twice as many instances of introverted behavior as extroverted behavior ; those ...
... recall behaviors that were relevant to a job for which she was being considered . Those who evaluated her for a job as “ research librarian ” recalled twice as many instances of introverted behavior as extroverted behavior ; those ...
Contents
How we do social psychology | 8 |
Social psychology and human values | 24 |
Does our behavior determine our attitudes? | 44 |
Copyright | |
30 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
actions actually aggression altruism American answer arousal asked attitudes attractive attribution error behavior believe Berkowitz biases Bibb Latané Chapter communication conflict conformity correlation culture decision deindividuation desegregation differences dissonance effect emotional evaluated example expectations experimenter experiments explain factors favor feel female FIGURE frustration fundamental attribution error group polarization groupthink hindsight bias hostility human illusory correlation indicate individual influence ingroup bias interaction Journal of Personality judgments jurors jury laboratory Lee Ross less male norms observed one's overjustification effect participants people's perceived percent Perhaps Personality and Social persuasive phenomenon positive predict prejudice questions racial recall relationship responses rewards self-esteem self-perception theory self-serving bias sex roles shock similar Similarly situation social facilitation social loafing Social Psychology someone sometimes stereotypes suggest teachers television tend tendency theory thinking University victim vivid woman women