Social PsychologyMcGraw-Hill, 1983 - 674 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 76
Page 265
... similar to us ; contrary to the old proverb , opposites generally do not attract . Not only do we like people who are similar to us , we are also influenced by them . For example , Theodore Dembroski , Thomas Lasater , and Albert ...
... similar to us ; contrary to the old proverb , opposites generally do not attract . Not only do we like people who are similar to us , we are also influenced by them . For example , Theodore Dembroski , Thomas Lasater , and Albert ...
Page 512
... similar on the part of the Soviet to our view of them — a mirror image . ” world that the capitalist Quantitative analysis of the content of American and Soviet mass media countries are preparing to has identified similar perceptions ...
... similar on the part of the Soviet to our view of them — a mirror image . ” world that the capitalist Quantitative analysis of the content of American and Soviet mass media countries are preparing to has identified similar perceptions ...
Page 569
... similar to the one who judges ( Burger , 1981 ) . To see one reason why this might be , recall from Chapter 3 the ... similar to what Kelly Shaver ( 1970 ) has called “ defensive attribution ” ; we sometimes defend ourselves against ...
... similar to the one who judges ( Burger , 1981 ) . To see one reason why this might be , recall from Chapter 3 the ... similar to what Kelly Shaver ( 1970 ) has called “ defensive attribution ” ; we sometimes defend ourselves against ...
Contents
How we do social psychology | 8 |
Social psychology and human values | 24 |
Does our behavior determine our attitudes? | 44 |
Copyright | |
30 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
actions actually aggression altruism American answer arousal asked attitudes attractive attribution error behavior believe Berkowitz biases Bibb Latané Chapter communication conflict conformity correlation culture decision deindividuation desegregation differences dissonance effect emotional evaluated example expectations experimenter experiments explain factors favor feel female FIGURE frustration fundamental attribution error group polarization groupthink hindsight bias hostility human illusory correlation indicate individual influence ingroup bias interaction Journal of Personality judgments jurors jury laboratory Lee Ross less male norms observed one's overjustification effect participants people's perceived percent Perhaps Personality and Social persuasive phenomenon positive predict prejudice questions racial recall relationship responses rewards self-esteem self-perception theory self-serving bias sex roles shock similar Similarly situation social facilitation social loafing Social Psychology someone sometimes stereotypes suggest teachers television tend tendency theory thinking University victim vivid woman women