Social PsychologyMcGraw-Hill, 1983 - 674 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 88
Page 122
... subjects in experiments . For instance , in one actual experiment most subjects failed to assist a seizure victim . Being told how most subjects really acted had almost no effect upon people's predictions of how the individual they ...
... subjects in experiments . For instance , in one actual experiment most subjects failed to assist a seizure victim . Being told how most subjects really acted had almost no effect upon people's predictions of how the individual they ...
Page 233
... subjects disturbed Milgram . The procedures he used equally disturbed many social psychologists . Although the " learner " in these experiments actually received no shock ( he disengaged himself from the electric chair and turned on a ...
... subjects disturbed Milgram . The procedures he used equally disturbed many social psychologists . Although the " learner " in these experiments actually received no shock ( he disengaged himself from the electric chair and turned on a ...
Page 257
... subjects conformed 37 percent of the time . Richard Crutchfield automated Asch's procedure in a way that enables testing several real subjects at once and asking them a variety of questions . Like Asch , Crutchfield was startled at the ...
... subjects conformed 37 percent of the time . Richard Crutchfield automated Asch's procedure in a way that enables testing several real subjects at once and asking them a variety of questions . Like Asch , Crutchfield was startled at the ...
Contents
How we do social psychology | 8 |
Social psychology and human values | 24 |
Does our behavior determine our attitudes? | 44 |
Copyright | |
30 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
actions actually aggression altruism American answer arousal asked attitudes attractive attribution error behavior believe Berkowitz biases Bibb Latané Chapter communication conflict conformity correlation culture decision deindividuation desegregation differences dissonance effect emotional evaluated example expectations experimenter experiments explain factors favor feel female FIGURE frustration fundamental attribution error group polarization groupthink hindsight bias hostility human illusory correlation indicate individual influence ingroup bias interaction Journal of Personality judgments jurors jury laboratory Lee Ross less male norms observed one's overjustification effect participants people's perceived percent Perhaps Personality and Social persuasive phenomenon positive predict prejudice questions racial recall relationship responses rewards self-esteem self-perception theory self-serving bias sex roles shock similar Similarly situation social facilitation social loafing Social Psychology someone sometimes stereotypes suggest teachers television tend tendency theory thinking University victim vivid woman women