Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of Washington, Volume 111Bancroft-Whitney Company, 1921 |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed agent agreed agreement alleged amount appellant application assignment authority bank bonds BRIDGES building cause charge claim clear Code complaint condition construction contended contract corporation cost damages deed defendant Department direct duty effect entered evidence executed existing fact favor filed findings follows FULLERTON fund furnished further given held HOLCOMB hold interest issue judge judgment July June jury land lien MACKINTOSH MAIN material ment mortgage notice operation Opinion owner paid PARKER parties passed payment person plaintiff possession present prior purchase question reason received record reference relator Reported respondent rule Seattle statement statute street sufficient superior court taken term testimony thereof tion TOLMAN trial court verdict Wash wife witnesses
Popular passages
Page 330 - Provided, That nothing in this section shall be so construed as to prevent the employment of a seamstress by any family for manufacturing articles for such family use. None of...
Page 498 - Qdonies, like rights passed to the grantees in the royanmarters, in trust for the communities to be established." Upon the American Revolution, these rights, charged with a like trust, were vested in the original States within their respective borders, subject to the rights surrendered by the Constitution to the United States.
Page 404 - ... and inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the...
Page 460 - It was tried to the court sitting without a jury, and resulted in a Judgment in favor of the respondent. The ultimate question Is whether these ways passed under the bill of sale.
Page 103 - The writ must be issued in all cases where there is not a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy, in the ordinary course of law.
Page 22 - To determine whether a given case falls within the one class or the other, we must inquire whose is the work being performed, a question which is usually answered by ascertaining who has the power to control and direct the servants in the performance of their work.
Page 202 - ... calling on the plaintiff to show cause why the defendant should not be discharged out of custody, on entering a common appearance, on the ground of a variance between the writ and the copy served; the discrepancy being between the words " sheriffs of London " in the one, and " sheriff of London
Page 87 - A cause of action arising out of the contract or transaction set forth in the complaint as the foundation of the plaintiff's claim, or connected with the subject of the action; 2.
Page 300 - electrical corporation," when used in this chapter, includes every corporation, company, association, joint-stock association, partnership and person, their lessees, trustees or receivers appointed by any court whatsoever...
Page 498 - The new states admitted into the Union since the adoption of the Constitution have the same rights as the original states in the tidewaters, and in the lands under them, within their respective jurisdictions.
Bibliographic information
| Title | Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of Washington, Volume 111 |
| Authors | Washington (State). Supreme Court, Arthur Remington, Solon Dickerson Williams |
| Publisher | Bancroft-Whitney Company, 1921 |
| Original from | Harvard University |
| Digitized | 13 Aug 2007 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |