Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan, Volume 159
Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, James M. Reasoner, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, Richard W. Cooper
Phelphs & Stevens, printers, 1910
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action affirmed agent agreement alleged amount appeal applied asked assessment authority bank bill bond building cause charge circuit judge claim Company complainant condition considered construction contract corporation costs counsel court damages December Decided decree deed defendant defendant's denied determine Detroit directed entered error evidence executed fact filed follows furnished further give given GRANT ground held interest issue John judgment jury land lease machines material matter Mich Michigan MOORE mortgage motion notes notice objection opinion owner paid parties person plaintiff possession premises present proceedings purchase question Railway reason received record recover reference refused relator respondent reversed rule says statute street Submitted suit taken testified testimony tion township trial verdict wife witness writ
Page 283 - We think that the true rule of law is that the person who, for his own purposes, brings on his land and collects and keeps there anything likely to do mischief if it escapes, must keep it in at his peril ; and if he does not do so, is prima facie answerable for all the damage which is the natural consequence of its escape.
Page 456 - In any contract for the sale of railroad or street railway equipment, or rolling stock, it shall be lawful to agree that the title to the property sold, or contracted to be sold, although possession thereof may be delivered immediately or at any time or times subsequently, shall not vest in the vendee until the purchase price shall be fully paid, or that the vendor shall have and retain a lien thereon for the unpaid purchase money.
Page 714 - No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title...
Page 5 - food," as used herein, shall include all articles used for food or drink by man, whether simple, mixed, or compound. SEC. 3. Any article shall be deemed to be adulterated within the meaning of this Act...
Page 5 - If any inferior or cheaper substance or substances have been substituted wholly or in part for it. (3) If any valuable or necessary constituent or ingredient has been wholly or in part abstracted from it. (4) If it is an imitation of or is sold under the name of another article.
Page 7 - In the case of mixtures or compounds which may be now or from, time to time hereafter known as articles of food, under their own distinctive names, and not an imitation of or offered for sale under the distinctive name of another article, if the name be accompanied on the same label or brand with a statement of the place where said article has been manufactured or produced. Second. In the case of articles labeled, branded, or tagged so as to plainly Indicate that they are compounds, imitations, or...
Page 353 - Utah, to say whether the facts made a case of murder in the first degree or murder in the second degree...
Page 475 - Illinois, do make, publish, and declare this, as and for my Last Will and Testament, hereby revoking all former wills by me made.
Page 192 - A husband cannot be examined for or against his wife, without her consent; nor a wife for or against her husband, without his consent; nor can either, during the marriage or afterwards, be, without the consent of the other, examined as to any communication made by one to the other during the marriage...
Page 192 - This element of confidentiality must be essential to the full and satisfactory maintenance of the relation between the parties. (3) The relation must be one which in the opinion of the community ought to be sedulously fostered. (4) The injury that would inure to the relation by the disclosure of the communications must be greater than the benefit thereby gained for the correct disposal of litigation.