 But, in truth, the mere relation of the master and the servant never can imply an obligation on the part of the master to take more care of the servant than he may reasonably be expected to do of himself. He is no doubt bound to provide for the safety...  A Treatise on the Law of Negligence - Page 198by Francis Wharton - 1874 - 889 pagesFull view - About this book
 | Charles Greenstreet Addison - 1847 - 988 pages
...conceal the danger of injury, and lull to sleep the vigilance and prudence of the servant. " The master is, no doubt, bound to provide for the safety of his...the best of his judgment, information, and belief; but the law does not imply from the mere relation of master and servant an obligation on the part of... | |
 | Charles Manley Smith - 1852 - 638 pages
...the master and the servant never can imply an obligation on the part of the master to take more care of the servant than he may reasonably be expected to do of himself, lie is no doubt bound to provide for the safety of his servant, in the course of his employment, to... | |
 | Joseph Kinnicut Angell, Thomas Durfee - 1857 - 484 pages
...liability provided such knowledge had appeared. They, however, remarked, that the master was, without doubt, bound to provide for the safety of his servant...the best of his judgment, information and belief. From this and from the dicta and observations scattered through the cases, in which this subject has... | |
 | Edwin Tyrrell Hurlstone, John Paxton Norman, Great Britain. Court of Exchequer - 1857 - 1036 pages
...v. Fowler, 3 M. & VY. 1. EXCHEQUER KKPORTS. 1856. duty on the part of the master to take more care of the servant than he may reasonably be expected to do of himself. That decision has been followed by several cases (a), and is now established law, though, I believe,... | |
 | Oliver Lorenzo Barbour, New York (State). Supreme Court - 1858 - 724 pages
...himself the hazard of an injury which may arise in the course of his business or employment. The master is no doubt bound to provide for the safety of his...the best of his judgment, information and belief. But the servant is not bound to risk his safety in the service of his McMillan v. Saratoga and Washington... | |
 | Charles Manley Smith - 1860 - 622 pages
...the master and the servant never can imply an obligation on the part of the master to take more care of the servant than he may reasonably be expected...information and belief. The servant is not bound to ri>k his safety in the service of his master, and may, if he thinks fit, decline any service in which... | |
 | John Scott, Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas - 1865 - 566 pages
...the master and the servant never can imply an obligation on the part of the master to take more care of the servant than he may reasonably be expected to do of himself. lie is, no doubt, bound to provide for the safety of his servant in the course of his employment, to... | |
 | 1866 - 606 pages
...safely? " The servant there was in fact the person who actually drove the van. He says — "The master is, no doubt, bound to provide for the safety of his...the best of his judgment, information, and belief." Bat he also says — "In truth, the mere relation of the master and servant never can imply an obligation... | |
 | 786 pages
...imply an obligation on the part of the master to take more of the servant than he can be reasonably expected to do of himself. He is, no doubt, bound...the best of his judgment, information, and belief." In Priestly v. Fowler the two servants were engaged in one act of service, so that the question of... | |
 | 1869 - 820 pages
...relation of master and servant never can imply an obligation on the part of the master to take more care of the servant than he may reasonably be expected to do of himself. In our own state, the point has never been fairly presented. In Kce.f/an v. Western Railroad Co., 4... | |
| |
