| 1979 - 1566 pages
...shall be the exclusive representative. Section 7116(b) (7) of the compromise version adds "picketing in a labor-management dispute If such picketing interferes with an agency's operations" as an unfair labor practice by a labor organization. In National Treasury Employees Union v. Fraser,... | |
| United States - 1980 - 574 pages
...participate in, a strike, work stoppage, o; slowdown, or picketing of an agency in a labor-managemen dispute if such picketing interferes with an agency's...paragraph by failing to take action to prevent or stoj such activity; or (8) to otherwise fail or refuse to comply with any provisioi of this chapter.... | |
| United States - 1999 - 904 pages
...chapter; (7XA) to call, or participate in, a strike, work stoppage, or slowdown, or picketing of an agency in a labor-management dispute if such picketing...failing to take action to prevent or stop such activity; or (8) to otherwise fail or refuse to comply with any provision of this chapter. Nothing in paragraph... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Governmental Affairs - 1995 - 588 pages
...interferes with an agency's operations . . . ." Section 71 16(b)(7)(B) makes it an unfair labor practice "to condone any activity described in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph by failing to take -4action to prevent or stop such activity . . . .' Section 71 16(b), however, expressly provides that... | |
| United States. Federal Labor Relations Authority - 1999 - 82 pages
...chapter; (7)(A) to call, or participate in, a strike, work stoppage, or slowdown, or picketing of an agency in a labor-management dispute if such picketing...failing to take action to prevent or stop such activity; or (8) to otherwise fail or refuse to comply with any provision of this chapter. Nothing in paragraph... | |
| Michael A. Round - 1999 - 140 pages
...interferes with an agency's operations. or tB) to condone any activity described in subparagraph tA) of this paragraph by failing to take action to prevent or stop such activity PATCO had obviously violated this section. The strike put PATCO in its weakest legal position. But... | |
| |