and V, against the person on whose account the compensation, insurance, or maintenance and support allowance is payable." Insurance is under title III. If it was the purpose of Congress to constitute of the unpaid premiums an absolute indebtedness to the United States so as to be collectible under the provisions of section 22, then the provision in the proviso of section 304 for the deduction of the unpaid premiums from "the insurance in any settlement thereunder" is surplusage and meaningless in view of the general provision in section 22. The War Risk Insurance Act of October 6, 1917, 40 Stat. 398, provided for the issuance of policies of war risk term insurance in amounts ranging from $1,000 to $10,000, in multiples of $500. Section 400, 40 Stat. 409. There was a restriction placed upon the amount of insurance which could be issued, but there was no limitation upon the number of separate contracts. The World War Veterans' Act provides for the conversion of term insurance into various policies of United States Government life insurance, and these policy forms differ in their terms from the provisions of the war risk term insurance contract. Two or more separate and distinct contracts of Government insurance, the total of which does not exceed $10,000, may be held by the same veteran, and each one of such contracts is governed and controlled by the provisions of that particular contract. Section 304 is a part of any contract reinstated thereunder. White v. United States, 270 U. S. 175, 180. See Prior to the amendment of section 304 by the act of July 2, 1926, supra, in order to reinstate insurance it was necessary to pay all back premiums, and at which time the general provisions as to collection of indebtedness, in section 22, supra, were in force. In the amendment of July 2, 1926, Congress provided for the reinstatement of insurance without payment of back premiums but requiring that a lien be established in the amount of unpaid premiums with interest, which should be placed as an interest-bearing indebtedness against "the insurance" and such indebtedness "to be deducted in any settlement thereunder." These provisions clearly show that the lien was to be treated as an indebtedness against any in surance which was reinstated under section 304 and the language precludes placing the indebtedness against any insurance other than that reinstated under that section. While Congress has made a general provision in section 22 for deduction of any indebtedness due the United States, such provision has been limited in contracts of insurance reinstated under section 304 by the qualifying provisions in that section restricting the application of the lien for unpaid premiums to the policy reinstated thereunder. The legislative history of section 304 shows no intent to the contrary. My opinion is that a lien, representing back premiums, established in the reinstatement of a policy of insurance under section 304 is a contingent indebtedness against such reinstated insurance only, to be deducted solely from any settlement under such reinstated policy. Respectfully, WILLIAM D. MITCHELL. INDEX-DIGEST ABANDONMENT. Ship abandoned to foreign insurer. *Shipping. 342. General Accounting Office, jurisdiction. The Tennessee Valley Authority is not subject to the pro- 84. Settlement warrants may properly be used to make avail- Contract Settlement Act. 84. *Contracts. 328, 357. Relocation of families on lands acquired for defense. *Emergency Withheld pay, disposition. *Attorney General. 324. AIR COMMERCE ACT. Permits, foreign aircraft. *Civil Aeronautics Act. 136. Appropriations available until expended. There is no legal objection to a request to the Congress to AIRCRAFT. Application of antitrust laws to air carriers. Agreements between United States air carriers, or between Agreements of foreign air carriers, in which no United NOTE. The asterisk (*) means See, indicating where the opinion is digested, e.g.— Ship abandoned to foreign insurer. Shipping. 342, This means that the opinion is digested herein under "Shipping" and that the text of the 798037-49- -38 567 AIRCRAFT-Continued. Air Force appropriations. *Air Force. 555. Airman certificates. *Civil Aeronautics Act. 3. Aviation agreements, validity. *Treaties. 451. Trap fishing, authority to limit. *Fisheries. 175. Sales to Filipinos. *Enemy Property. 432. Air Force appropriations. *Air Force. 555. Life insurance, Philippine forces. *Insurance. 185. 289. *Hatch Act. 103. *Officers. 168, 187, *Officers. 183. Officer, participation in profits of law firm. Veterans' benefits. See Veterans. 561. War. All opinions relating to War indexed under that heading. Claims against Government. *Claims. 269. Constitutional questions, administrative officers. There are grave objections to the rendition of opinions by ATTORNEY GENERAL-Continued. There can rarely be proper occasion for an opinion by the The question of the disposition of pay "forfeited" by a Judicial questions. It has been the uniform rule of the Attorneys General to AUTOMOBILE TIRES. 286. Requisitioning for defense. *Requisitions. 240. BANKS. Property of foreign state. *Federal Reserve Act. BONDS. Certifying vouchers. *Officers. 284. BUILDINGS. Assignment of space. 45. 400. Subject to the limitation against removing a department or The determinations of the Public Buildings Administra- 140. A provision for use of a building by a particular agency may CANAL ZONE. Civil Service, citizens of Panama. *Employees. 515. *Exportation. 42. |