| United States - 2000 - 1208 pages
...not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made... | |
| United States. Patent Office - 1952 - 170 pages
...not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 ~of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1956 - 444 pages
...not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1956 - 536 pages
...disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title [the prior art], if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1957 - 1662 pages
...decisions of the courts and in writings. Section 103 states this requirement in the title. It refers to the difference between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art, meaning what was known before as described in section 102. If this difference is such that the subject... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1960 - 1034 pages
...reason that, even though an invention is "new and useful" it is not patentable "if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made... | |
| United States. Department of the Army - 1961 - 346 pages
...not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1961 - 1442 pages
...invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1961 - 1928 pages
...the present statute, 35 USC 103, for convincing J the Commissioner of Patents that the— differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art I are such that the subject matter as a whole would not have been obvious at tin time the invention... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1962 - 938 pages
...invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill... | |
| |