Mergers and economic concentration: hearings before the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Monopoly, and Business Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary, Ninety-sixth Congress, first session, on S. 600 ....U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979 |
Contents
1 | |
79 | |
89 | |
98 | |
108 | |
124 | |
133 | |
149 | |
375 | |
400 | |
406 | |
433 | |
460 | |
470 | |
487 | |
505 | |
162 | |
165 | |
177 | |
183 | |
226 | |
272 | |
297 | |
311 | |
518 | |
524 | |
533 | |
548 | |
565 | |
582 | |
621 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acquired companies acquired firms acquisition aggregate concentration American antitrust laws assets average Becton Dickinson believe benefits BENSTON bill BURTIS capital cash flow Celler-Kefauver Act Chairman CHUMBRIS Clayton Act coal committee competition concern conglomerate mergers Congress consumers Corp costs diversified dollar earnings economic effect efficiency employees enterprise equity Exxon Federal Federal Trade Commission foreign FREEMAN going Government growth impact income increase interest investment investors labor large firms largest major manufacturing Marcor ment merger activity million MILLSTEIN Mobil monopoly National Occidental Petroleum oil and gas oil companies oil industry operations PAC's percent petroleum plant political political action committees predatory pricing problem production profits question RIORDAN Senator KENNEDY Senator METZENBAUM Senator THURMOND share shareholders small business social Standard Oil statement stockholders subcommittee takeover tender offer Tenneco tion trade United uranium
Popular passages
Page 35 - No corporation shall acquire, directly or indirectly, the whole or any part of the stock or other share capital and no corporation subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Trade Commission shall acquire the whole or any part of the assets of...
Page 524 - Harvey Brooks, Dean of the Division of Engineering and Applied Physics at Harvard and chairman of the committee which prepared the report, outlined some of the basic assumptions that had been made.
Page 41 - United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co., 376 US 651 (1964); United States v. Penn-Olin Chem.
Page 34 - Report to the President and the Attorney General of the National Commission for the "Review of Antitrust Laws and Procedures (January 22, 1979 ), Chapter Tx~.
Page 8 - States, or (2) any other proposed acquisition or merger or consolidation under this section whose effect in any section of the country may be substantially to lessen competition, or to tend to create a monopoly...
Page 253 - ... of section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Celler-Kefauver Act of 1950 ("Section 7"), and as reflected in its legislative history and interpretation by the United States Supreme Court.
Page 61 - know" what it is, yet we encounter endless difficulties in trying to define it. We can "tell" whether one person or group is more powerful than another, yet we cannot measure power. It is as abstract as time yet as real as a firing squad.
Page 555 - ... nation. The goals should provide generally that: • There should be significant reductions in the average national rate of growth in energy consumption as compared to historical trends. A target for the long term growth rate should be set at 2 percent per year and reviewed annually by the Congress; • All possible measures should be taken to encourage the most efficient production and use of energy; • Each sector of the economy should achieve the lowest possible energy requirements subject...
Page 600 - While providing significant limitations on the ability of all individuals and groups to contribute large amounts of money to candidates, the Act's contribution ceilings do not foreclose the making of substantial contributions to candidates by some major special interest groups through the combined effect of individual contributions from adherents or the proliferation of political funds each authorized under the Act to contribute to candidates.
Page 36 - Grocery Co., 384 US 270 (1966); United States v. Aluminum Co. of America, 377 US 271 (1964); United States v. Philadelphia Natl.