Social PsychologyMcGraw-Hill, 1996 - 712 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 84
Page 39
... better than if asked whether they describe someone else . If asked to compare ourselves with a character in a short story , we remember that character better . Two days after a conversation with someone , our recall is best for what the ...
... better than if asked whether they describe someone else . If asked to compare ourselves with a character in a short story , we remember that character better . Two days after a conversation with someone , our recall is best for what the ...
Page 170
... better , warmer , and cuddlier to me as predictor is a shabby excuse indeed . Such words are shocking . Do Meehl and the other researchers underestimate our intuition ? To see why their findings are apparently true , consider the as ...
... better , warmer , and cuddlier to me as predictor is a shabby excuse indeed . Such words are shocking . Do Meehl and the other researchers underestimate our intuition ? To see why their findings are apparently true , consider the as ...
Page 382
... better than do their individual members ( Vollrath & others , 1989 ) . Moreover , some of the biases that contaminate individual judgments have much less effect after the jurors deliberate ( Kaplan & Schersching , 1980 ) . De ...
... better than do their individual members ( Vollrath & others , 1989 ) . Moreover , some of the biases that contaminate individual judgments have much less effect after the jurors deliberate ( Kaplan & Schersching , 1980 ) . De ...
Contents
INTRODUCING SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY | 1 |
Obvious ways in which Values Enter | 8 |
HOW WE DO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY | 18 |
Copyright | |
78 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
actions aggression Alice Eagly altruism American arousal asked attitudes attractive attribution error believe Chapter cial cognitive colleagues communicator conformity correlation culture depressed dissonance Eagly effect emotional evaluate evolutionary psychologists example expectations experimenter experiments explain explanatory style factors favor feel Figure friends fundamental attribution error gender group polarization groupthink havior human Illusory correlation individual influence Journal of Personality judgments jurors jury laboratory later less males ment Milgram mood motivated negative norms observed one's ourselves people's perceive percent Personality and Social persuasion positive predict prejudice primacy effect questions recall relationships responses rewards role self-efficacy self-esteem Self-perception theory self-serving bias sexual shock situations social loafing social psy Social Psychology someone sometimes stereotypes teacher television theory things tion traits Universal Press Syndicate University women Yorker Magazine