Social PsychologyMcGraw-Hill, 1996 - 712 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 82
Page 23
... Consider this example : Do you favor or oppose increased spending for wel- fare programs ? If you are like the people in one survey ( Tourangeau & others , 1989 ) , you would be likely to favor increased spending - if shortly before you ...
... Consider this example : Do you favor or oppose increased spending for wel- fare programs ? If you are like the people in one survey ( Tourangeau & others , 1989 ) , you would be likely to favor increased spending - if shortly before you ...
Page 54
... consider teachers ' ways of explaining students ' good and bad perfor- mances . When there is no need to feign modesty , those assigned the role of teacher tend to take credit for positive outcomes and blame failure on the stu- dent ...
... consider teachers ' ways of explaining students ' good and bad perfor- mances . When there is no need to feign modesty , those assigned the role of teacher tend to take credit for positive outcomes and blame failure on the stu- dent ...
Page 170
... consider the as- sessment of human potential by graduate admissions interviewers . Dawes ( 1976 ) explained why statistical prediction is so often superior to an inter- viewer's intuition when predicting certain outcomes such as ...
... consider the as- sessment of human potential by graduate admissions interviewers . Dawes ( 1976 ) explained why statistical prediction is so often superior to an inter- viewer's intuition when predicting certain outcomes such as ...
Contents
INTRODUCING SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY | 1 |
Obvious ways in which Values Enter | 8 |
HOW WE DO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY | 18 |
Copyright | |
78 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
actions aggression Alice Eagly altruism American arousal asked attitudes attractive attribution error believe Chapter cial cognitive colleagues communicator conformity correlation culture depressed dissonance Eagly effect emotional evaluate evolutionary psychologists example expectations experimenter experiments explain explanatory style factors favor feel Figure friends fundamental attribution error gender group polarization groupthink havior human Illusory correlation individual influence Journal of Personality judgments jurors jury laboratory later less males ment Milgram mood motivated negative norms observed one's ourselves people's perceive percent Personality and Social persuasion positive predict prejudice primacy effect questions recall relationships responses rewards role self-efficacy self-esteem Self-perception theory self-serving bias sexual shock situations social loafing social psy Social Psychology someone sometimes stereotypes teacher television theory things tion traits Universal Press Syndicate University women Yorker Magazine