Interstate Commerce Commission Reports: Reports and Decisions of the Interstate Commerce Commission of the United States, Volume 146

Front Cover
 

Contents

St Regis Paper Co v B O R R Co 59
1
Joint Council of International Apple Shippers Asso v E R
3
Grain and Grain Products Transit on at Kansas City Mo
8
Lumber from Page
11
Burnham Hanna Munger Co v C R I P Ry Co
14
Kelley Lumber Co v St L S W Ry Co 657
23
ButterworthJudson Corp v Director General 88 I C C 19 663
27
Great Northern Ry Co
33
Calivada Fertilizer Co v S P Co 73 I C C 496
34
Points in Arkansas and Oklahoma on Kansas City South
37
C B Q R R Co 55 I C C 199 367
48
N P Ry Co 17 I C C 95 409
49
CoOperative Exchange v A V I Ry Co 479
59
Railway Car Material 118 I C C 105 693
61
Southwestern Coal Operators Asso v A W Ry Co
89
Hartland R R Co v B O R R Co 87 I C C 36
94
Campbells Creek Coal Co v A A R Co 33 I C C 558
98
Chicago Gravel Co v
101
Magnolia Petroleum Co v A T S F Ry Co 592
103
Southwestern Milling Co v A T S F Ry Co 118
118
Spelter from Blackwell 120 I C C 576 498
124
Cannelton Sewer Pipe Co v Director General 73 I C C 27
134
American Wringer Co v N Y N H H R R Co 136
136
Knoxville Freight Bureau v L N R R Co 329
139
Atlantic Cotton Asso v A C Y Ry Co 245
149
Page
156
Director General as Agent 1
163
Kansas City Brick Co v K C S Ry Co 87 I C C 646__ 309
181
Louisville Nashville R R Co
184
Consolidated Classification Case 54 1 C C 1 22
193
Oklahoma Traffic Asso v A G S R R Co 113 I C C 635 714
196
Bissinger Co v G N Ry Co 120 I C C 745
197
Augusta Cotton Exchange v G F Ry 245
199
M P R R Co 87 I C C 622 _ _ _ 563
205
Cotton Exchange of Augusta v G F Ry 245
213
Flory Milling Co v C N E Ry Co 93 I C C 129
216
Republic Coal Co v C St P M O Ry Co 85 I C C
219
Meeker Co v Lehigh Valley R R Co 236 U S 412____
220
Central New England Ry Co Standard Hardwood Lumber
225
Hay and Straw to Mississippi Valley 95 I C C 209 670
233
Dexter Ice Fuel Power Co v C E I Ry Co 559
235
Rio Grande Irrigation Co v Gildersleeve 174 U S 603
238
Standard Oil Co v
241
Williamson Inman Stribling v L N R R Co
245
Forest Products from Decatur 126 I C C 252
252
Cotton and Cotton Linters from Mississippi Valley 69 I C C
269
Daisy Mfg Co v A V Ry Co 81 I C C 44 22
276
Dodge County Lumber Co v A C L R R Co 221
283
Chicago Gravel Co v A T S F Ry Co 118 I C C 633
291
Baltimore Ohio R R Co
293
Midcontinent Oil Rates 36 I C C 109
309
Chicago Heights Mfrs Asso v
324
Pickrel Walnut Co v C B Q R R Co
327
Card Lumber Co v N C St L Ry 140 I C C 421___ 465
330
Middle Creek R R Acquisition by 117 I C C 103 ___ 95
333
Clay from Florida 40 I C C 275 789
334
Merchants Manufacturers Traffic Bureau v
353
A T S F Ry Co 756
357
National Asso
370
CocaCola Co v B O R R Co 92 I C C 340__
371
Electric Service Co v A T S F Ry Co 705
374
Wolff Mfg Corp v A S Ry Co
377
Concentration of Cotton at New Orleans 83 I C C 18_____
389
Acme Belting Co v A R R R Co 52 I C C 15_ 738
409
Henry Marble Co v B O R R Co
414
Lautz Marble Corp v E R R Co 136 I C C 183
416
Standard Paint Co v Director General 142 I C C 221 331
444
Fourth Section Departures 136 I C C 516
446
De Forest Co v A T S F Ry Co 139 I C C 619 _ _ _
447
State
453
Penna R R Co v International Coal Co 230 U S 184___ 162
469
French Battery Carbon Co v C N W Ry Co 112
471
A T S F Ry Co
479
Cedar Hill Coal Coke Co v C S Ry Co 16 I C C 387
484
Holmquist Lumber Fuel Co v C A R R Co
491
Allied Packers v B O R R Co 123 I C C 115 606
546
GarrattCallahan Co v A C L R R Co 88 I C C 103
548
Merchants Miners Transporation Co Boston Maine
552
Liberty Glass Co v M P R R Co 89 I C C 362
553
F A Class Scale Case 45 I C C 254_ 410 557 575
557
Scott County Milling Co v B C R R Co 113 I C C 675
559
Scott Paper Co v P R R Co 26 I C C 601
574
Wolff Packing Co v A W Ry Co 141
583
L R R v Standard Oil Co 275 U S 257
585
Christie Eastern Ry Co Southern Pine Asso v 37
587
Holland Furnace Co v B O R R Co 136 I C C 479
589
Lissberger Co v P R R Co
597
Portland Traffic Transportation Asso v O W R R N Co
602
Midwest Refining Co v B A P Ry Co
607
National Pole Co v A T S F Ry Co 144 I C C 541__
608
Sterling Oil Refining Co v M V R R Co 761
609
Cleveland Cincinnati Chicago St Louis Ry Co
621
Stoll Oil Refining Co v St L S W Ry Co
623
Hormel Co v C M St P Ry Co 273
625
B V T Co 51 I C C 697
626
Mississippi Railroad Commission v
630
Straight Line Engine Co Inc v D L W R R Co
640
WattersTonge Lumber Co v G S I R R Co
647
Prairie Oil Gas Co v
649
MississippiWarrior Federal Barge Line Birmingham Traffic
654
York Haven Paper Co v P R R Co
661
Railroad Commissioners of State of Iowa v C R R Co
662
Straw Excelsior Hay and Other Commodities between Offi
664
Fertilizers between Southern Points 113 I C C 389 34 212
669
Great Western Smelting Refining Co v Director General
685
Eagle Cotton Oil Co v S Ry Co 140 I C C 131
687
Railway Car Material between Points in Illinois Classifica
691
Clovis Mill Elevator Co v A S Ry Co 417
697
MissouriKansasTexas R R Co Southern Kansas Grain
700
Illinois Central R R Co
708
Hallsboro Mfg Co v S Ry Co 144 I C C 13
721
Musselman Co v P R R Co
735
Barnsdall Refineries Inc v M V R R Co
741
Indiana State Chamber of Commerce v A T S F
742
RichardsScheble Candy Co v A T S F Ry Co 479
753
Grand Trunk Ry 236 U S 662
762
Weatherford Crump Co v A R R R Co 245
763
National Zinc Co v A V Ry Co 132 I C C 249_ _ _ _ 153
776
Hamersley Mfg Co v E R R Co 126 I C C 491___
782
Indiana Harbor Belt R R Co Chicago Gravel Co et al v 101
783
Routing Cancellation on Petroleum and Petroleum Products
785
Central R R Co v United States 257 U S 247 308 389
794
OdellDaly Material Co v Director General 60 I C C 737 553
799
Table of commodities_
801
Table of localities
811
St Louis Hannibal R R Co Cameron Joyce Co v 751
844
Index digest
853
Chicago Burlington Quincy R R Co
854
Beans Dried and Other Vegetables from Wyoming 283
855
Western Maryland Ry Co Stickell Sons Inc v 609
859
Portland Traf Trans Asso v O W R R N Co 142
861
International Paper Co v B R P Ry Co 146 I C C
864
Bissinger Co v G N Ry Co 197
866
Potlatch Lumber Co v N P Ry Co 14 I C C 41 458
867
Young Sons Mercantile Co v A T S F Ry Co 479
869
International Apple Shippers Asso Joint Council v E R
874
Westmoreland Brick Co v P R R Co 577
875
Board of Railroad Commissioners of State of Iowa v C R
878
Iowa Railroad Commissioners v C R R Co of N J 109
881
Boise Valley Traction Co Hurst v 625
885
Sugar Stored in Transit at MississippiWarrior Service Ports 382
894
213
895
C E I Ry Co 559
897
Marvil Package Co v N W R R Co 140 I C C 78 689
903
Brooks Co v I C R R Co 708
905
PowersBegg Co v W Ry Co 122 I C C 476 605
920
Buffalo Rochester Pittsburgh Ry Co International Paper
925
Southwestern Milling Co v A T S F Ry Co 118 I C C
930
Standard Oil Co v A T S F Ry Co 89 I C C 425 241
938

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 163 - But it is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence or an act not amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligent or wrongful act, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances.
Page 142 - ... over or by means of such additional or extended line of railroad, unless and until there shall first have been obtained from the Commission a certificate that the present or future public convenience and necessity require or will require...
Page 140 - Whenever the Commission is of opinion that shortage of equipment, congestion of traffic, or other emergency requiring immediate action exists in any section of the country...
Page 162 - ... liable. to the person or persons injured thereby for the full amount of damages sustained in consequence of any such violation of the provisions of this act...
Page 740 - ... no carrier by railroad subject to this part shall abandon all or any portion of a line of railroad, or the operation thereof, unless and until there shall first have been obtained from the Commission a certificate that the present or future public convenience and necessity permit of such abandonment.
Page 140 - Commission may after subsequent hearing find to be just and reasonable; (c) to require such joint or common use of terminals, including main-line track or tracks for a reasonable distance outside of such terminals...
Page 144 - might so -exert its whole constitutional power in regulating interstate commerce as to render that agreement unenforceable or to impair its value.
Page 143 - Commission a certificate that the present or future public convenience and necessity require or will require the construction, or operation, or construction and operation, of such additional or extended line...
Page 140 - Commission shall have, and it is hereby given, authority, either upon complaint or upon its own initiative without complaint, at once, and if it so orders without answer or other formal pleading by the interested carrier or carriers, but upon reasonable notice...
Page 143 - Any construction, operation or abandonment contrary to the provisions of this paragraph or of parigraph (18) or (19) of this section may be enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction at the suit of the United States, the commission, any commission or regulating- body of the state or states affected, or any party in interest...

Bibliographic information