...about the Illinois system: "Pupils compelled by law to go to school for secular education are released in part from their legal duty upon the condition that...falls squarely under the ban of the First Amendment . . . ." McCollum v. Board of Education, supra, at pp. 209-210. I see no significant difference between...

...First Amendment, as made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth, . . ."' and in the other: ". . . the ban of the First Amendment (made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth) . . ." 2 This is surprising, as well as disappointing. Earlier in his career the Justice...

...separate religious sects. Pupils compelled by law to go to school for secular education are released in part from their legal duty upon the condition that...faith. And it falls squarely under the ban of the 1st 5 Earlier this year the 'Supreme Court dismissed an appeal for want of a substantial Federal question...

...separate religious sects. Pupils compelled by law to go to school for secular education are released in part from their legal duty upon the condition that...tax-established and tax-supported public school system to aid religions groups to spread their faith. And it falls squarely under the ban of the 1st amendment (made...

...Indeed, since, from all that appears in either record, any teacher who does not wish to do so is free 4 "This is beyond all question a utilization of the...system to aid religious groups to spread their faith." McCollum v. Board of Education, 333 US 203, 210. (Emphasis added.) 67-815 O — 06 56 not to participate,8...

...with the program of religious instruction • • *. This Is beyond all question a ntillzatlon of tbe taxestablished and tax-supported public school system...their faith And it falls squarely under the ban of tbe First Amendment • • *." "The State also affords sectarian groups an invaluable aid In that...

...to go to school for secular ition are released in part from their legul duty upon the condition that attend the religious classes. This is beyond all question a utilization of the stabliahed and tax-supported public s?hool system to aid religious groups •ead their faith. And it...

...program violated the first and fourteenth amendments. The Court held the program unconstitutional, as "a utilization of the tax-established and taxsupported...school system to aid religious groups to spread their 5» Quick Bear v. Leupp, 210 VS. SO (1908), is not in point, because it dealt with tribal funds, not...

...separate religious sects. Pupils compelled by law to go to school for secular education are released in part from their legal duty upon the condition that...first amendment (made applicable to the States by the 14th) as we interpreted it in Everton v. Board of Education, » • *." (333 US, at 209-210). He went...

...for religious instruction." But the entire opinion makes clear that it was an additional factor, the "utilization of the tax-established and tax-supported...system to aid religious groups to spread their faith," that was conclusive. Zorach, v. Clauson — in which the Court refused to invalidate the New York "off...