What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action administrative affirmed agreement Amendment applied arbitration argued Attorney authority bargaining basis benefits Board Brief California cause Certiorari denied claims Clause Commission concern concluded concurring Congress consider constitutional contract Convention Corp Court of Appeals creation criminal decision defendant denied determination disability discretion dissenting District Court effect employees enforcement ERISA established evidence fact federal filed granted hearing held holding impairment individual inmates intent interest issue judge judgment judicial jurisdiction JUSTICE land language legislative limited majority means ment noted officers Opinion particular parties permit person petition petitioner practice present prison procedures protected provides question reason record regulation religious Reported request respondents result rule sentence severity standard Stat statute STEVENS substantial supra taking tion trial union United violated witness
Page 460 - The freedom verbally to challenge police action is not without limits, of course; we have recognized that "fighting words" which "by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace" are not constitutionally protected. Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, supra, at 572;
Page 223 - §78aa. Section 27 provides in relevant part: "The district courts of the United States . . . shall have exclusive jurisdiction of violations of this title or the rules and regulations thereunder, and of all suits in equity and actions at law brought to enforce any liability or duty created by this title or the rules and regulations thereunder.
Page 437 - (b) A witness shall be paid an attendance fee of $30 per day for each day's attendance. A witness shall also be paid the attendance fee for the time necessarily occupied in going to and returning from the place of attendance at the beginning and end of such attendance or at any time during such attendance.
Page 642 - Section 2072 confirms the supervisory authority that the Court has over lower federal courts: "The Supreme Court shall have the power to prescribe by general rules, the forms of process, writs, pleadings, and motions, and the practice and procedure of the district courts and courts of appeals of the United States in civil actions.
Page 485 - (footnote omitted). Section 2, therefore, embodies a clear federal policy of requiring arbitration unless the agreement to arbitrate is not part of a contract evidencing interstate commerce or is revocable "upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract." 9 USC §2. "We see nothing in the Act indicating that the broad principle of
Page 68 - The Little Tucker Act, of course, covers not only contract claims, but also other claims for money damages "founded either upon the Constitution, or any Act of Congress, or any regulation of an executive department, ... or for liquidated or unliquidated damages in cases not sounding in tort.
Page 140 - The court focused on the statutory provision that a person is disabled "only if his physical or mental impairment or impairments are of such severity that he is not only unable to do his previous work but cannot, considering his age, education, and work experience, engage in any other kind of substantial gainful work . . . .
Page 222 - The Arbitration Act accomplishes this purpose by providing that arbitration agreements "shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract.
Page 390 - Suits for violation of contracts between an employer and a labor organization representing employees in an industry affecting commerce as defined in this chapter, or between any such labor organizations, may be brought in any district court of the United States having jurisdiction of the parties, without respect of the amount in controversy or without regard to the citizenship of the parties.
Page 388 - (a) Except as otherwise expressly provided by Act of Congress, any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending.