 This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to carry persons or property without reward : neither...  The Quarterly Journal of Economics - Page 324edited by - 1895Full view - About this book
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1891 - 782 pages
...it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights. the state cannot require a railroad corporation '... | |
 | 1890 - 548 pages
...it is not to be inferred that this power of limiiation or regulation is itself withont limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
 | 1902 - 988 pages
...it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This B \ j1 ' E W) Z 俳V $@ Bj #Zr DfV( Sp ^I _ ނ i[f d CY ܫ X V I x Under pretense of regulating fares and freights the state cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
 | 1897 - 1036 pages
..."it is not to be Inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is Itself without limit This power to regulate Is not a power to destroy, and limitation Is not the équivalent of confiscation. Under the pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1897 - 790 pages
...it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy ; and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under the pretence of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad to carry persons... | |
 | Victor Morawetz - 1886 - 642 pages
...it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. 1 See the cases cited in the pre- Union Tel. Co. v. Axtell, 69 Ind. ceding section. 199; State v. Bell... | |
 | John Norton Pomeroy, Edmund Hatch Bennett - 1886 - 764 pages
...it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
 | Chicago and Alton Railroad Company - 1886 - 470 pages
...it must not be inferred that this power of "limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is "not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confisca"tion. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the State can not "require a railroad corporation... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1927 - 992 pages
...appealed to for a change. Several years later it was recognized in Railroad Commission 116 US 307, 331, that the " power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation." The fundamental duty of the courts, so far as public regulation is concerned, is to prevent confiscation.... | |
| |
