Agricultural Marketing and Bargaining (additional Hearings).: Hearings, Ninety-second Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 14987
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Agriculture. Subcommittee on Domestic Marketing and Consumer Relations
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972 - 91 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
additional agricultural amendments American antitrust appear applicable appreciate authority bargaining association basic believe bill Board broiler Chairman changes committee commodities competitive CONGRESS THE LIBRARY consumers continue contract cooperative cotton course court crop Datt dealing DENHOLM Department effect exemption fact Farm Bureau farmers favorable Federation FINDLEY FOLEY forced full supply further going grain growers handler hearing House increased independent industry interest join language LAUTERBACH legislation LIBRARY OF CONGRESS limited major marketing marketing order meet milk negotiate objections opposed organization percent period permit person position present president prior problems processing processors producers proposed provisions purchase qualified association questions reasonable record Relations represent requirements respect revised Section 114 Sisk sold specifically statement subcommittee supply testimony Thank tion United Washington witness Zwach
Page 6 - ... any penalty or forfeiture for or on account of any transaction, matter, or thing concerning which he is compelled, after having claimed his privilege against self-incrimination, to testify or produce evidence, except that such individual so testifying shall not be exempt from prosecution and punishment for perjury committed in so testifying.
Page 6 - Witnesses summoned before the Board, its member, agent, or agency, shall be paid the same fees and mileage that are paid witnesses in the courts of the United States, and witnesses whose depositions are taken and the persons taking the same shall severally be entitled to the same fees as are paid for like services in the courts of the United States.
Page 5 - United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, by filing in such court a written petition praying that the order of the Board be modified or set aside.
Page 5 - If either party shall apply to the court for leave to adduce additional evidence and shall show to the satisfaction of the court that such additional evidence is material and that there were reasonable grounds for the failure to adduce such evidence in the hearing before the Board, its member, agent, or agency...
Page 5 - ... shall have jurisdiction of the proceeding and of the question determined therein, and shall have power to make and enter upon the pleadings, testimony, and proceedings set forth in such transcript a decree affirming, modifying, or setting aside the order of the commission or board.
Page 5 - Board may modify Its findings as to the facts, or make new findings, by reason of additional evidence so taken...
Page 5 - Secretary thereupon shall file in the court the record of the proceedings on which he based his action, as provided in section 2112 of title 28, United States Code. Upon the filing of such petition, the court shall have jurisdiction to affirm the action of the Secretary or to set it aside, in whole or in part, temporarily or permanently, but until the filing of the record, the Secretary may modify or set aside his order.
Page 4 - Board shall be of the opinion that any person named in the complaint has engaged in or is engaging in any such unfair labor practice, then the Board shall state its findings of fact and shall issue and cause to be served on such person an order requiring such person to cease and desist from such unfair labor practice, and to take such affirmative action, including reinstatement of employees with or without back pay, as will effectuate the policies of this Act.