Legitimate Differences: Interpretation in the Abortion Controversy and Other Public DebatesUniversity of California Press, 2023 M12 22 - 225 pages Legitimate Differences challenges the usual portrayal of current debates over thorny social issues including abortion, pornography, affirmative action, and surrogate mothering as moral debates. How can it be said that our debates oppose principles of life to those of liberty, principles of liberty to those of equality, principles of equality to those of fairness, and principles of fairness to those of integrity, when we as Americans share all these principles? Debates over such issues are not, Georgia Warnke argues, moral debates over which principles we should adopt. Rather, they are interpretive debates over the meanings of principles we already possess. Warnke traces the structure of these debates with reference to the work of Jane Austen, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Jürgen Habermas, and Bernard Williams. In separate chapters on surrogate mothering, affirmative action, abortion, and pornography she articulates new understandings of the meanings of some of our principles and shows the equal legitimacy of some different interpretations of the meanings of others. Finally, she suggests that the orientation of American public policy ought to be directed less at finding single canonical interpretations of our principles than at accommodating different legitimate understandings of them. The perspective offered by Legitimate Differences should have a significantly beneficial effect on public discussions. This title is part of UC Press's Voices Revived program, which commemorates University of California Press's mission to seek out and cultivate the brightest minds and give them voice, reach, and impact. Drawing on a backlist dating to 1893, Voices Revived makes high-quality, peer-reviewed scholarship accessible once again using print-on-demand technology. This title was originally published in 1999. Legitimate Differences challenges the usual portrayal of current debates over thorny social issues including abortion, pornography, affirmative action, and surrogate mothering as moral debates. How can it be said that our debates oppose prin |
Contents
Surrogate Mothering and the Meaning of Family | 30 |
Affirmative Action Neutrality and Integration | 55 |
Interpretive Differences and the Abortion Debate | 81 |
Pornography Ideology and Silence | 106 |
Hermeneutic Debate and Deliberative Democracy | 133 |
Tradition and Ethical Knowledge | 158 |
Conclusions | 181 |
Notes | 194 |
Index | 210 |
Other editions - View all
Legitimate Differences: Interpretation in the Abortion Controversy and Other ... Georgia Warnke No preview available - 1999 |
Common terms and phrases
abortion debate affirmative action affirmative action policies African Americans Amendment antipornography feminists argue artificial insemination assume Austen birth blacks Chapter child ciples claims concern Constitutional context contract Court cultural custody Darcy debate over abortion decision derstanding Dworkin Elizabeth equal opportunity ethical knowledge fetus fetuses free speech Gadamer groups Habermas Hans-Georg Gadamer Hence hermeneutic human Ibid idea ideals individuals insists integration interpretive discussion interpretive voices involved issues Jim Crow laws Jürgen Habermas legitimacy legitimate interpretive legitimate understandings liberty MacKinnon meaning moral discourse Moreover multicultural societies neutrality norms one's parents participation political pornography possible practices pregnancy prejudices Pride and Prejudice principle of equal pro-choice pro-life advocates public debates question racial responsibility Ronald Dworkin sanctity seems self-understanding Sense and Sensibility sexual simply social sort speech act Strossen surrogacy surrogate mothering terpretations thick concepts tion tradition validity woman women